The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is highly expressed in almost all types of cells. NF-κB is involved in many complex biological processes, in particular in immunity. The activation of the NF-κB signaling pathways is also associated with cancer, diabetes, neurological disorders and even memory. Hence, NF-κB is a central factor for understanding not only fundamental biological presence but also pathogenesis, and has been the subject of intense study in these contexts. Under healthy physiological conditions, the NF-κB pathway promotes synapse growth and synaptic plasticity in neurons, while in glia, NF-κB signaling can promote pro-inflammatory responses to injury. In addition, NF-κB promotes the maintenance and maturation of B cells regulating gene expression in a majority of diverse signaling pathways. Given this, the protein plays a predominant role in activating the mammalian immune system, where NF-κB-regulated gene expression targets processes of inflammation and host defense. Thus, an understanding of the methodological issues around its detection for localization, quantification, and mechanistic insights should have a broad interest across the molecular neuroscience community. In this review, we summarize the available methods for the proper detection and analysis of NF-κB among various brain tissues, cell types, and subcellular compartments, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. We also summarize the flexibility and performance of these experimental methods for the detection of the protein, accurate quantification in different samples, and the experimental challenges in this regard, as well as suggestions to overcome common challenges.

The phosphatidyl-inositol 3 kinase (PI3K) δ inhibitor, idelalisib (IDE), is a potent inhibitor of the B-cell receptor pathway and a novel and highly effective agent for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We evaluated the activities of IDE in comparison to bendamusine (BEN), a commonly used alkylating agent, in primary CLL cells ex vivo. In contrast to BEN, IDE was cytotoxic to cells from extensively-treated patients, including those with a deletion (del)17p. Cross-resistance was not observed between BEN and IDE, confirming their different modes of cytotoxicity. Marked synergy was seen between BEN and IDE, even in cases that were resistant to BEN or IDE individually, and those with deletion (del) 17p. CD40L/interleukin 4 (IL4) co-treatment mimicking the CLL microenvironment increased resistance to IDE, but synergy was retained. PI3Kδ-deficient murine splenic B cells were more resistant to IDE and showed reduced synergy with BEN, thus confirming the importance of functional PI3Kδ protein. Although IDE was observed to induce γH2AX, IDE did not enhance activation of the DNA damage response nor DNA repair activity. Interestingly, IDE decreased global RNA synthesis and was antagonistic with 5,6-Dichlorobenzimidazole 1-b-D-ribofuranoside (DRB), an inhibitor of transcription. These findings add to the increasingly complex cellular effects of IDE, and B cell receptor (BCR) inhibitors in general, in CLL.

Introduction: We are targeting DNA repair pathways to enhance existing chemoradiotherapeutic strategies against medulloblastoma (MB) and malignant glioma (MG), two highly invasive tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Current methods to treat childhood medulloblastoma are highly intrusive and lead to poor quality of life while the three-year survival rate of patients afflicted with malignant glioma remains abysmal (<5%). Recurrence of these exceedingly malignant tumors is pervasive as they can adopt several mechanisms to resist anti-cancer therapeutics including activation and up-regulation of DNA repair pathways that act to resolve DNA damage elicited by radiation and chemotherapeutic agents (chemo-radiotherapy). DNA repair inhibitors like Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARPi), DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKi) and Ataxia Telengiectasia Mutated (ATMi) have shown promise to sensitize tumors to DNA damaging chemo-radiotherapeutics as these inhibitors specifically target single yet highly critical DNA repair response pathway enzymes. In combination with anti-tumor agents, these sensitizers can significantly augment anti-cancer therapeutic success. However, differing tumors have variable expression/activity of these enzymes and their corresponding repair pathway(s), therefore; their identification, characterization and the development of strategies to modulate their expression can enhance current anti-tumor treatment efficacy. Methods: I will identify specific differentially-regulated DNA repair enzymes/pathways by gene expression methodology. From these findings, I will inhibit these DNA repair enzymes via shRNA or enzyme-specific inhibitors (if available), to chemosensitize MB and MG cells to DNA damaging therapeutics in an effort to reduce DNA repair in these cells thereby boosting tumor genotoxicity and cell death. Extent of DNA damage will be measured using novel high-throughput DNA repair assays combined with unique cellular DNA damage reporters/sensors to facilitate these studies. Results: In comparing subsets of MB and MG cell lines with existing DNA repair inhibitors, I have found differing DNA repair pathways as potential targets to sensitize these CNS tumors to chemo-radiotherapeutics. MB cells rely on DNA-PK/SSBR (single strand break repair) dependent pathways to resolve induced genotoxicity, while MG utilizes the ATM/SSBR pathways. My focus is now to expand this dataset in additional pertinent tumors and to perform a detailed comparative analysis to identify specific highly active tumor-specific DNA repair enzymes with which to target in order to enhance tumor cell death. These include the use of DNA damage repair response PCR arrays to compare the expression levels of individual DNA repair enzyme/pathway members amongst these CNS tumors. Conclusion: I have identified unique DNA repair enzymes, which may mediate specific differential chemo-radioresistant phenotypes in MB and MG. An expanded analysis is currently underway to further differentiate DNA repair mechanisms and therapeutic responses between these two brain tumor types. I hope to translate these findings into pre-clinical models whereby my data may lead to identifying next-generation brain cancer treatments with improved patient survival and quality-of-life. Citation Format: Marina Mostafizar, Sachin Katyal. Enhancing chemotherapeutic responses in CNS malignancy through suppression of hyperactive DNA damage repair pathways [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A21.

Idelalisib (IDE) is an inhibitor of the δ isoform of PI3 kinase and has shown high activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) either when given alone or in combination with bendamustine (BEN) /rituximab (BR). In the present study, we have determined whether there is cross-resistance between BEN and IDE in primary CLL cells in vitro and whether synergy is observed upon combining these agents. In primary CLL cells in vitro, cross-resistance was not observed between BEN and IDE suggesting different modes of cytotoxicity. In contrast to BEN, sensitivity to IDE was not influenced by prior clinical treatment or the presence of a del 17p. Marked synergy in cytotoxicity was seen between BEN and IDE, which was paralleled by changes in γ-H2AX staining. These findings suggest that the synergistic antitumor effect was related to enhanced DNA damage by the drug combination. The degree of cytotoxic synergy varied and synergy was observed in some cases that were resistant to BEN or IDE, and those with del 17p. Synergy between BEN and IDE was also seen in the B cell lines, BJAB and I83, and in healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells indicating that the phenomenon was not CLL-specific. To simulate the microenvironment, CLL cells were pre-stimulating with CD40L and IL4 prior to drug treatment. Interestingly this treatment caused the cells to become resistant to IDE, but BEN sensitivity was unaffected. However, combining BEN and IDE produced greater synergy than observed when cells were incubated without IL4/CD40. To examine the role of PI3Kδ for synergy, B cells from C57 BL/6 mice, both wild type and with non-functioning PI3Kδ protein, were exposed to BEN and/or IDE. Cells with the non-functioning PI3Kδ protein were more resistant to IDE than the wild-type cells and showed lesser synergy confirming the importance of this protein for the synergistic effect. In summary, these results confirm that IDE can be active against BEN-resistant CLL cells, while BEN may remain active against IDE-resistant samples, demonstrating different modes of anti-tumor activity. However, the unique yet inconsistent synergy seen between these two agents suggest an overlapping mechanism of action. Ongoing studies are evaluating the mechanism for this synergy. Citation Format: Sara E. F. Kost, Ali Saleh, Edgard M. Mejia, Marina Mostafizar, Eric D. J. Bouchard, Versha Banerji, Aaron J. Marshall, Spencer B. Gibson, Sachin Katyal, James B. Johnston. Cross-resistance and synergy between idelalisib and bendamustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1891.