Introduction Children with Down syndrome (DS) often present with chronic respiratory symptoms. Congenital airway anomalies have been described but data about prevalence is scarce and a comparison to controls is lacking. We aim to compare the endoscopic and clinical data of children with DS to controls without significant medical history. Methods All endoscopic procedures under general anesthesia (broncho‐ and/or direct laryngoscopy) in patients with DS were reviewed. We compared clinical and endoscopic data to a cohort of children with respiratory symptoms but without any other relevant medical history. Results Endoscopic data were available for 65 patients with DS. The median age was 2.9 years (range: 0.2‐17), 63% were boys. The most common clinical presentation was recurrent respiratory infections (37%). Other major symptoms were chronic cough and/or noisy breathing (23%) and stridor (20%). Endoscopy was normal in 29% of patients. The largest group of patients (44%) had some form of airway malacia. Tracheal bronchus and subglottic stenosis were each isolated findings in 3.1% of patients. Twenty percent presented with combined airway anomalies. The control group consisted of 150 children (matched for age and sex) without significant underlying disease. The most common presentations were chronic cough and/or noisy breathing (29%), persistent radiographic abnormalities (20%), and suspicion of aspiration of a foreign body (15%). In the majority of controls (68%), no airway anomaly was found. Other findings were malacia (22%), tracheal bronchus (1%), and subglottic stenosis (1%). A combined anomaly was found in 5%. Conclusion Congenital airway anomalies were seen in 71% of patients with DS, compared with 32% of controls. Combined anomalies are more frequent in DS. Complete lower airway endoscopy is recommended in patients with DS as it may influence therapeutic decision‐making.

No abstract

(1) Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and lower airway anomalies are both highly prevalent in children with Down syndrome (DS). However, little is known on the interaction between both. We aim to investigate the co-occurrence of OSA (defined as obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (oAHI) ≥ 2/h) and lower airway anomalies in children with DS and explore their impact on OSA severity and treatment outcome. (2) Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from airway endoscopy and polysomnography (PSG) in a cohort of children with DS. (3) Results: Data on both lower airway evaluation and PSG were available for 70 patients with DS. Our study population was relatively young (mean age 3.5 years), not obese and presented with severe OSA (mean oAHI 13.1/h). Airway anomalies were found in 49/70 children (70%), most frequently laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia or a combined airway malformation. In the remaining 21 cases (30%), endoscopy was normal. A comparison between both groups showed a similar distribution of gender, age and BMI z-scores. The prevalence of OSA was not significantly higher in DS patients with airway anomalies (89.6% vs 71.4%, p = 0.078). Additionally, OSA severity or treatment choice (conservative, upper airway surgery or CPAP) were not significantly different. Follow-up data (available for 49/70 patients) showed a significant improvement of OSA in both groups. There is a not significant tendency to more patients with persistent OSA among those with lower airway anomalies (34.3% vs 7.1%, p = 0.075). (4) Conclusions: We found no significant differences in OSA severity, treatment choice or outcome between children with DS with and without lower airway anomalies. Further studies should investigate the role of DISE-directed treatment and compare the outcome of different treatment modalities in larger patient groups.