Jamaica’s ageing population, high prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and associated functional impairments suggest the need for a sustainable long-term care (LTC) system. This paper describes the current LTC system in Jamaica. A review of empirical and grey literature on LTC was supplemented with consultations and interviews and group discussions for knowledge exchange, impact and engagement events with stakeholders being conducted as part of a project on dementia care improvement. Four key findings emerged: (1) Jamaica’s LTC system depends substantially on informal care (both unpaid and paid); (2) there is a need for strategic coordination for LTC across the state, cross-ministerial, private, and volunteer sectors; (3) compulsory insurance and social protection schemes appear to exacerbate rather than narrow socioeconomic inequalities in LTC; and (4) there is a lack of systematic LTC data gathering and related information systems in both the private and public sector—for both institutional and community-based care. For LTC in Jamaica and the broader Caribbean region to be sustainable, more evidence-informed policies and practices that address inequalities in access to services, ability to pay for care, direct support from government, and the risk of needing LTC are needed.

This article provides descriptive insights of the experiences of family caregivers of persons living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were generated as part of a qualitative cross-national project to explore the costs and consequences of providing unpaid dementia care. Participants in Jamaica, who were recruited using community gatekeepers, information booths at health fairs, conferences, and other outreach events, were contacted by telephone to discuss their experiences of the pandemic. When face-to-face in-depth interview data collection was suspended due to the pandemic, ethical approval was received to contact all research participants who were informal unpaid family caregivers, both those whose care recipients had died and those who were active caregivers ( N = 19). Participants in this study were the 10 active family caregivers ( n F = 8; aged 45+; 60% from high socio-economic status). Their updates and reflections during these calls were documented in fieldnotes and analyzed for key themes. Data showed that the pandemic has illustrated the direct costs, both financial and otherwise, that informal dementia carers bear in Jamaica. It also intensified pre-existing challenges faced by family carers. We provide recommendations for sustainable support for family carers.

Background Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targeted dementia prevention at the earliest. Accurate assessment of SCD is crucial. However, current measures lack important psychometric evaluations and or reporting. Objectives To systematically evaluate measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess SCD in the older adult population with or at risk of AD. Methods and analysis We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 Checklist for reporting. We conducted a literature search, screened, and included validation studies of SCD based on self-reported questionnaires from both population-based and clinical studies, conducted in older adults (≥ 55). We critically appraised the included primary studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Results Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported psychometric properties of 17 SCD self-reported questionnaires. We extracted data on the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and cross-cultural validity and found a widespread proneness to bias across studies, and a marked heterogeneity is assessed and reported measurement properties that prevented the consolidation of results. Conclusion Our findings suggest that available SCD questionnaires lack content validity evaluation. Currently available measurements of SCD lack development and validation standards. Further work is needed to develop and validate SCD self-reported measurement with good quality measurement properties.

As COVID-19 pandemic continues, documentation about the experiences and coping strategies of members of vulnerable groups is needed to inform appropriate interventions. This study's aims were to describe the lived experiences of persons from these groups during the pandemic; to describe the strategies and interventions that authorities, family members, and caregivers used to support them; and to identify opportunities for collaboration and closing gaps in care. Data for this study were collected as part of a larger study on health risk communication for vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semistructured interviews focusing on three purposefully selected administrative areas were conducted remotely using Zoom, WhatsApp video, or telephone call for the majority of participants, and with appropriate safety protocols in place where necessary. A sign language interpreter assisted. Vulnerable persons (n older persons = 9, n deaf persons = 2, n blind persons = 3, n persons with a physical disability = 6, n persons with a mental illness = 5) and nine key informants from advocates and service providers shared perspectives about experiences, resources, unmet needs, and gaps for these target groups. Inductive thematic analysis indicated that members of vulnerable groups experienced stigma and societal insensitivity, fears of contracting COVID-19, social isolation, and emotional distress, exacerbated by diminished resources and increased barriers to accessing necessary services and support during the pandemic. Deductive thematic analysis (using the American Psychological Association recommendations for eliminating disparities in mental health status and care) highlighted the need for increased research and partnerships that incorporate the voices of the vulnerable for the development of evidence-informed, segmented strategies and interventions, and mechanisms for more equitable access to support.