No abstract

Gastric cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, is a heterogeneous disease. We aim to establish clinically relevant molecular subtypes that would encompass this heterogeneity and provide useful clinical information. We use gene expression data to describe four molecular subtypes linked to distinct patterns of molecular alterations, disease progression and prognosis. The mesenchymal-like type includes diffuse-subtype tumors with the worst prognosis, the tendency to occur at an earlier age and the highest recurrence frequency (63%) of the four subtypes. Microsatellite-unstable tumors are hyper-mutated intestinal-subtype tumors occurring in the antrum; these have the best overall prognosis and the lowest frequency of recurrence (22%) of the four subtypes. The tumor protein 53 (TP53)-active and TP53-inactive types include patients with intermediate prognosis and recurrence rates (with respect to the other two subtypes), with the TP53-active group showing better prognosis. We describe key molecular alterations in each of the four subtypes using targeted sequencing and genome-wide copy number microarrays. We validate these subtypes in independent cohorts in order to provide a consistent and unified framework for further clinical and preclinical translational research.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy targeting the programmed cell death protein–1 (PD-1) axis elicits durable antitumor responses in multiple cancer types. However, clinical responses vary, and biomarkers predictive of response may help to identify patients who will derive the greatest therapeutic benefit. Clinically validated biomarkers predictive of response to the anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab include PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in specific cancers and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) regardless of tumor type. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and T cell–inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) are emerging predictive biomarkers for pembrolizumab. Both PD-L1 and GEP are inflammatory biomarkers indicative of a T cell–inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME), whereas TMB and MSI-H are indirect measures of tumor antigenicity generated by somatic tumor mutations. However, the relationship between these two categories of biomarkers is not well characterized. RATIONALE: This study assessed the potential for TMB and a T cell–inflamed GEP to jointly predict clinical response to pembrolizumab in >300 patient samples with advanced solid tumors and melanoma across 22 tumor types from four KEYNOTE clinical trials. To assess the individual and joint clinical utility of TMB and GEP, patients were stratified in four biomarker–defined clinical response groups [GEP low and TMB low (GEPlo TMBlo), GEP low and TMB high (GEPlo TMBhi), GEPhi TMBlo, and GEPhi TMBhi] based on predefined cutoffs for TMB and GEP. These patient–defined biomarker groups were further used to guide transcriptome and exome analyses of tumors in a large molecular database [The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)] (n = 6384 tumors) to identify targetable patterns of biology that may modulate response and resistance. RESULTS: TMB and GEP exhibited only modest correlation and were independently predictive of response across the KEYNOTE clinical datasets. We found that objective response rates were strongest in patients with GEPhi TMBhi (37 to 57%), moderate in those with GEPhi TMBlo (12 to 35%) and GEPlo TMBhi (11 to 42%), and reduced or absent in those with GEPlo TMBlo (0 to 9%) (see the figure). Additionally, longer progression–free survival times were seen in patients with higher levels of both TMB and GEP. Findings were comparable when TMB and PD-L1 expression were jointly assessed. Within TCGA database, GEP and TMB again had a low correlation, demonstrating the potential to jointly stratify transcriptomic and genomic features across cancer types. Specific gene expression patterns reflective of TME biology showed significant associations with TMB, GEP, or both. In particular, gene set enrichment analysis identified proliferative and stromal, myeloid, and vascular biology corresponding to specific TMB-defined subgroups within GEPhi tumors. In TMBhi tumors, indication-dependent somatic DNA alterations in key cancer driver genes showed a strong negative association with GEP. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows that TMB and inflammatory biomarkers (T cell–in...

Purpose: Molecular classification of breast cancer has been proposed based on gene expression profiles of human tumors. Luminal, basal-like, normal-like, and erbB2+ subgroups were identified and were shown to have different prognoses. The goal of this research was to determine if these different molecular subtypes of breast cancer also respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Fine needle aspirations of 82 breast cancers were obtained before starting preoperative paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Gene expression profiling was done with Affymetrix U133A microarrays and the previously reported ''breast intrinsic''gene set was used for hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to assign molecular class. Results: The basal-like and erbB2+ subgroups were associated with the highest rates of pathologic complete response (CR), 45% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 24-68] and 45% (95% CI, 23-68), respectively, whereas the luminal tumors had a pathologic CR rate of 6% (95% CI, 1-21). No pathologic CR was observed among the normal-like cancers (95% CI, 0-31). Molecular class was not independent of conventional cliniocopathologic predictors of response such as estrogen receptor status and nuclear grade. None of the 61genes associated with pathologic CR in the basal-like group were associated with pathologic CR in the erbB2+ group, suggesting that the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy sensitivity may vary between these two estrogen receptor^negative subtypes. Conclusions: The basal-like and erbB2+ subtypes of breast cancer are more sensitive to paclitaxel-and doxorubicin-containing preoperative chemotherapy than the luminal and normallike cancers.Breast cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease. Histologically similar tumors may have different prognoses and may respond to therapy differently. It is believed that these differences in clinical behavior are due to molecular differences between histologically similar tumors. DNA microarray technology is ideally suited to reveal such molecular differences. A novel molecular classification of breast cancer based on gene expression profiles was recently proposed (1). The investigators identified a set of stably expressed genes (''intrinsic gene set''; n = 534) that accounted for much of the molecular differences between 42 breast cancers and did hierarchical cluster analysis to identify subgroups of cancers with separate gene expression profiles. Luminal, basal-like, normal-like, and erbB2+ subgroups were identified and were shown to have different prognoses (1 -4). These results were confirmed in follow-up experiments by the same group and others using larger numbers of cases. The basal-like (mostly estrogen receptor negative) and erbB2+ (mostly HER-2 amplified and estrogen receptor negative) subgroups had the shortest relapse-free and overall survival, whereas the luminal-type (estrogen receptorpositive) tumors had a more favorable clinical outcome (2 -4).