Since bacterial infection is a rising complication following the wide use of implant, there is considerable attention on the effect of implant surface properties on bacterial adhesion. In this study, the effect of silver (Ag) doped hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings on initial antibacterial adhesion and osteoblast cell proliferation and differentiation was investigated. Using a sol-gel process, HA coatings doped with 1 wt % AgNO(3) (AgHA1.0) and 1.5 wt % Ag (AgHA1.5) were prepared. Coated surfaces were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and contact angles measurements. The initial bacteria adhesion was evaluated using a RP12 strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984) and the Cowan I strain of Staphylococcus aureus, whereas osteoblast proliferation and differentiation were evaluated using human embryonic palatal mesenchyme cells (HEPM), an osteoblast precursor cell line. In this study, XRD analysis of all surfaces indicated peaks corresponding to HA. Contact angles for AgHA surfaces were observed to be significantly lower when compared to HA surfaces. In vitro initial bacterial adhesion study indicated a significantly reduced number of S. epidermidis and S. aureus on AgHA surfaces when compared to HA surface. The use of HEPM cells indicated no significant difference in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) production between all surfaces. Additionally, no differences in alkaline phosphatase specific activity were observed between HA and AgHA1.0 surfaces. Overall, it was concluded that AgHA1.0 has the similar biological activity as HA, with respect to bone cell proliferation and differentiation. In addition, the AgHA1.0 was also concluded to have the ability to minimize the initial bacteria adhesion. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2007.
To meet the challenge of regenerating bone lost to disease or trauma, biodegradable scaffolds are being investigated as a way to regenerate bone without the need for an auto- or allograft. Here, we have developed a novel microsphere-based chitosan/nanocrystalline calcium phosphate (CaP) composite scaffold and investigated its potential compared to plain chitosan scaffolds to be used as a bone graft substitute. Composite and chitosan scaffolds were prepared by fusing microspheres of 500-900 microm in diameter, and porosity, degradation, compressive strength, and cell growth were examined. Both scaffolds had porosities of 33-35% and pore sizes between 100 and 800 . However, composite scaffolds were much rougher and, as a result, had 20 times more surface area/unit mass than chitosan scaffolds. The compressive modulus of hydrated composite scaffolds was significantly higher than chitosan scaffolds (9.29 +/- 0.8 MPa vs. 3.26 +/- 2.5 MPa), and composite scaffolds were tougher and more flexible than what has been reported for other chitosan-CaP composites or CaP scaffolds alone. Using X-ray diffraction, scaffolds were shown to contain partially crystalline hydroxyapatite with a crystallinity of 16.7% +/- 6.8% and crystallite size of 128 +/- 55 nm. Fibronection adsorption was increased on composite scaffolds, and cell attachment was higher on composite scaffolds after 30 min, although attachment rates were similar after 1 h. Osteoblast proliferation (based on dsDNA measurements) was significantly increased after 1 week of culture. These studies have demonstrated that composite scaffolds have mechanical properties and porosity sufficient to support ingrowth of new bone tissue, and cell attachment and proliferation data indicate composite scaffolds are promising for bone regeneration.
These data support the hypothesis that chitosan-coatings are able to develop a close bony apposition or the osseointegration of dental/craniofacial and orthopedic implants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.