Lake Erie walleyes Sander vitreus support important fisheries and have been managed as one stock, although preliminary tag return and genetic analyses suggest the presence of multiple stocks that migrate among basins within Lake Erie and into other portions of the Great Lakes. We examined temporal and spatial movement and abundance patterns of walleye stocks in the three basins of Lake Erie and in Lake St. Clair with the use of tag return and sport and commercial catch-per-unit effort (CPUE) data from 1990 to 2001. Based on summer tag returns, western basin walleyes migrated to the central and eastern basins of Lake Erie and to Lake St. Clair and southern Lake Huron, while fish in the central and eastern basins of Lake Erie and in Lake St. Clair were primarily caught within the basins where they were tagged. Seasonal changes in sport and commercial effort and CPUE in Lake Erie confirmed the walleye movements suggested by tag return data. Walleyes tagged in the western basin but recaptured in the central or eastern basin of Lake Erie were generally larger (or older) than those recaptured in the western basin of Lake Erie or in Lake St. Clair. Within spawning stocks, female walleyes had wider ranges of movement than males and there was considerable variation in movement direction, minimum distance moved (mean distance between tagging sites and recapture locations), and mean length among individual spawning stocks. Summer temperatures in the western basin often exceeded the optimal temperature (20-238C) for growth of large walleyes, and the

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Since 1990, walleyes Sander vitreus in Lake Erie have been tagged annually with jaw tags to better understand the population dynamics and ecological characteristics of individual spawning populations. Although the data collected from this tagging program have been used for a variety of management purposes (e.g., estimating migration patterns, stock intermixing, and mortality rates), there has been only cursory examination of the shedding and reporting rates associated with the program. We used double tagging and high-reward tagging experiments to estimate tag shedding and reporting rates for jaw-tagged walleyes in Lake Erie. Double tagging of walleyes with jaw and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags suggested that the tagging method and tagging agency contributed to the observed variability in both immediate (within 21 d of tagging) retention and chronic jaw tag shedding rates. Agency-specific model-averaged estimates of immediate tag retention ranged from 95% to 99%. For chronic shedding, model-averaged instantaneous rates (annual) ranged from 0.07 to 0.28. Jaw tag reporting rates, estimated via releases of high-reward tags in 1990 and 2000, varied among tagging years, tagging basins, and commercial and recreational fisheries. In general, tag reporting rates were higher for the recreational fishery (range, 33-55%) than for the commercial fishery (10-17%),