Flue gas cleanup often requires the removal of SO x , NO x , and CO 2 in separate units before being emitted into the atmosphere. This stepwise treatment process incurs significant cost and energy penalty to the electricity production. A combined adsorption process based on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) by which these impurities are removed is envisioned as an efficient means of flue gas cleanup that can be applied relatively easily. In this study, the technological and economic feasibilities of a combined separation process in which SO x , NO x , and CO 2 are simultaneously removed from flue gas streams are assessed. Capital and operating costs are estimated based on sizing the equipment items and utilities needed, and the potentials for increased energy efficiency are determined in relation to the required PSA performance. The energy saving potential for the adoption of 2-bed and 4-bed PSA cycles is compared with conventional FGD, SCR, and amine scrubbing units needed to clean up flue gas in a stepwise fashion. The results show that energy savings can be expected when the PSA removal efficiency is greater than 90%. In the case of a 550 MW coal-fired power plant, the proposed system will impose an energy penalty of 24% to the cost of electricity, which is lower than that of current individual treatment units associated with SO x , NO x , and CO 2 removal. This energy penalty corresponds to a cleanup cost of $57/ton of all impurities captured for a 2-bed, four-step PSA process with a cycle time of 400 s, adsorption and desorption pressures of 10 and 1 bar, respectively, and a purge flow rate of 100 mol/s. This technoeconomic assessment shows that the integrated combined system can be an attractive technology compared to multi-step systems for the removal of flue gas impurities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.