Background--Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is regarded as an early step in the development of atherosclerosis. Among the pathogenetic factors leading to atherosclerosis, the role of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia as independent risk factors is still under debate. In this study, we examined the association between ED and insulin resistance in normotensive and normoglycemic first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods and Results--Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the brachial artery was measured with high-resolution ultrasound (13 MHz) in 53 normotensive FDRs (21 men, 32 women; mean age, 35 years) with normal oral glucose tolerance, 10 age-and sex-matched normal control subjects, and 25 DM patients (mean age, 57 years). According to the tertiles of the clamp-derived glucose metabolic clearance rate (MCR), the FDRs were further classified as insulin resistant with an MCR Յ5.8 mL ⅐ kg Ϫ1 ⅐ min

BackgroundFor endoscopic resection of early GI neoplasia, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) achieves higher rates of complete resection (R0) than endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, ESD is technically more difficult and evidence from randomised trial is missing.ObjectiveWe compared the efficacy and safety of ESD and EMR in patients with neoplastic Barrett's oesophagus (BO).DesignBO patients with a focal lesion of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or early adenocarcinoma (EAC) ≤3 cm were randomised to either ESD or EMR. Primary outcome was R0 resection; secondary outcomes were complete remission from neoplasia, recurrences and adverse events (AEs).ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient and lesion characteristics between the groups randomised to ESD (n=20) or EMR (n=20). Histology of the resected specimen showed HGIN or EAC in all but six cases. Although R0 resection defined as margins free of HGIN/EAC was achieved more frequently with ESD (10/17 vs 2/17, p=0.01), there was no difference in complete remission from neoplasia at 3 months (ESD 15/16 vs EMR 16/17, p=1.0). During a mean follow-up period of 23.1±6.4 months, recurrent EAC was observed in one case in the ESD group. Elective surgery was performed in four and three cases after ESD and EMR, respectively (p=1.0). Two severe AEs were recorded for ESD and none for EMR (p=0.49).ConclusionsIn terms of need for surgery, neoplasia remission and recurrence, ESD and EMR are both highly effective for endoscopic resection of early BO neoplasia. ESD achieves a higher R0 resection rate, but for most BO patients this bears little clinical relevance. ESD is, however, more time consuming and may cause severe AE.Trial registration numberNCT1871636

No abstract

No abstract

Selective transluminal RF ablation of the pancreas under EUS control in a living pig model is feasible. The new flexible bipolar probe creates an ablation area with extent related to the duration of application, and with fewer complications than conventional RF ablation techniques.