The purpose of this article is to present conditions implied in the use of Learning Management Systems (LMS), at the University of Borås (UB), Sweden, specifically in 2004, 2009, 2010, and 2018, highlighting patterns that characterize the routines adopted by the teachers. Utilizing quantitative and qualitative approaches, the exploratory research included the analysis of courses in area of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). In addition to a general analysis of the respective courses, a questionnaire was applied to 76 professors and 926 students from the mentioned courses. The pattern of use is analyzed by means of classification of tools in four groups; distribution tools, communication tools, interaction tools, and course management tools. The results confirm that LMS is widely utilized to distribute documents to students, while the tools facilitating interaction and collaboration are used sparingly and this pattern is consistent over time. Despite an increase in the total use of LMS, there is no increase in the use of digital tools for interaction in Higher Education, which indicates the importance of promoting a wide use of collaborative methods and of encouraging interaction.

Quantitative data about the use of various tools in the Learning Management System (LMS) in the year 2004, the academic year 2009-2010 and 2018 at a small Swedish university confirm the notion that increased use of educational software usually does not lead to a wider use of collaborative pedagogical methods. This paper aims to explain why lecturers predominantly use LMS to distribute documents to students, rather than to facilitate collaborative learning and interaction. A survey of lecturers and students' perceptions collected in the spring of 2019 with an online questionnaire provided additional qualitative data.The authors discuss the situation with restrictions due to the Corona pandemic and a change of LMS in the years 2019-2022 as a problem to both the education process and the collection of data, but also as an opportunity to accelerate the implementation of on-line digital methods. It remains to be seen if the increased use of off-campus methods in 2020 to 2022 will be persistent over time.In their conclusions the authors assert that a wider use of the tools for interaction depends on pedagogical practices built on social constructivist, learner centered theories of learning. They suggest that if higher education is only justified by the impact on economic growth, creation of new jobs and new products rather than as a means for personal growth and development, it works as a barrier to the use of pedagogical methods intended to elicit student activity and promote the creation of learner communities and shared perspectives.