Background: Breast cancer in very young women (BCVY) defined as <35 years old, presents with different molecular biology than in older patients. High HDAC5 expression has been associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC) tissue. We aimed to analyze HDAC5 expression in BCVY and older patients and their correlation with clinical features, also studying the potential of HDAC5 inhibition in BC cell lines. Methods: HDAC5 expression in 60 BCVY and 47 older cases were analyzed by qRT-PCR and correlated with clinical data. The effect of the HDAC5 inhibitor, LMK-235, was analyzed in BC cell lines from older and young patients. We performed time and dose dependence viability, migration, proliferation, and apoptosis assays. Results: Our results correlate higher HDAC5 expression with worse prognosis in BCVY. However, we observed no differences between HDAC5 expression and pathological features. Our results showed greatly reduced progression in BCVY cell lines and also in all triple negative subtypes when cell lines were treated with LMK-235. Conclusions: In BCVY, we found higher expression of HDAC5. Overexpression of HDAC5 in BCVY correlates with lower survival rates. LMK-235 could be a potential treatment in BCVY.

Introduction Real-life data about cefiderocol use to treat extensively drug-resistant bacteria are scarce. We aim to report our early experience in patients with difficult-to-treat infections and limited therapeutic options. Methods Patients treated with cefiderocol from March 2018 to April 2022 in a tertiary-care hospital in Spain were included. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data were collected up to 90 days after the end of treatment or until death. Survival status was recorded at 30 and 90 days. Results Ten patients were included, seven of them critically ill. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (40%) and bacteremia (40%) were the main infections. Multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated pathogen (70%, of which six patients were infected with bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance), followed by A. baumannii , E. coli , and A. xylosoxidans (10% each). Seven patients received combination therapy. Clinical and microbiological cures were achieved in 90% and 80% of patients, respectively. Two previously susceptible strains (20%) developed resistance to cefiderocol. Overall, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 10% and 50%, respectively, although two out of five patients died due to the infection. No serious adverse events were reported, except for one patient who developed thrombocytopenia. Conclusion Cefiderocol seems to be an effective and safe rescue therapy for patients infected with difficult-to-treat pathogens, although there is a definite risk of the emergence of resistance.

What is known and objective Betalactam antibiotics are the most frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) is a technique that induces temporary tolerance to a drug allowing a patient to receive the optimal agent. The increased use of RDD and the lack of standardization among available protocols in terms of formulation, starting dose, number of steps and dosing frequency make it essential to determine the safety and appropriate management of these protocols, especially regarding reconstitution, diluents, stability and drug administration in order to guarantee reproducibility. We reviewed betalactam desensitization protocols in a tertiary hospital, in accordance with currently published practices and evaluated its use on patients over a period of three years. Methods (a) We performed a literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases for case reports and/or systematic reviews describing desensitization protocols for betalactam antibiotics. Pharmacokinetic parameters and physicochemical stability were checked for each antibiotic. (b) We retrospectively reviewed inpatients undergoing our antibiotic desensitization protocols from February 2018 to January 2021. Data and outcomes of desensitization procedures were analysed. Results We developed nine RDD protocols: meropenem, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, ampicillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cloxacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, amoxicillin/clavulanate and penicillin G sodium. Five antibiotics have RDD protocols for two different doses, adjusted to patients with impaired renal function. Detailed data (diluent, total dose, volume, concentrations, duration and stability) of the protocol of each antibiotic used are provided. 28 desensitizations were performed in 17 patients, three of them with confirmed allergies by skin test. 26 out of 28 (92.9%) of them were successfully completed, including those three with positive skin results. The pathogens most frequently involved were E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa; both frequently associated with bacterial resistance. Meropenem, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime were the antibiotics most desensitized. 25 out of 26 (96.1%) procedures were successful in resolving the infection. What is new and conclusions Detailed information about compounding, dilution and stability is crucial to ensure safe and successful desensitization processes, as well as good coordination between the Allergy and Pharmacy departments. The increase in bacterial resistance to many of the commercially available antibiotics limits the therapeutic options for treating multidrug‐resistant infections; in those situations, antibiotic desensitization may be a key therapeutic option. Although there is a broad consensus in limiting the use of RDD to patients with confirmed allergy, in usual clinical practice its application in those strongly suspected of having type I hypersensitivity is still observed. Our betalactam desensitization protocols have shown themselves to be safe and effective, as evidenced by data from the 1...

Ruthenium compounds have demonstrated promising activity in different cancer types, overcoming several limitations of platinum-based drugs, yet their global structure–activity is still under debate. We analyzed the activity of Runat-BI, a racemic Ru(III) compound, and of one of its isomers in eight tumor cell lines of breast, colon and gastric cancer as well as in a non-tumoral control. Runat-BI was prepared with 2,2’-biimidazole and dissolved in polyethylene glycol. We performed assays of time- and dose-dependent viability, migration, proliferation, and expression of pro- and antiapoptotic genes. Moreover, we studied the growth rate and cell doubling time to correlate it with the apoptotic effect of Runat-BI. As a racemic mixture, Runat-BI caused a significant reduction in the viability and migration of three cancer cell lines from colon, gastric and breast cancer, all of which displayed fast proliferation rates. This compound also demonstrated selectivity between tumor and non-tumor lines and increased proapoptotic gene expression. However, the isolated isomer did not show any effect. Racemic Runat-BI is a potential drug candidate for treatment of highly aggressive tumors. Further studies should be addressed at evaluating the role of the other isomer, for a more precise understanding of its antitumoral potential and mechanism of action.