The OmpR regulator positively influences flagella synthesis and negatively regulates invasin expression in Yersinia enterocolitica. To determine the physiological consequences of this inverse regulation, we analyzed the effect of the ompR mutation on the ability of Y. enterocolitica Ye9 (serotype O9, biotype 2) to adhere to and invade human epithelial HEp-2 cells and to form biofilms. Cell culture assays with ompR, flhDC and inv mutant strains, which vary in their motility and invasin expression, confirmed the important contribution of flagella to the adherent-invasive abilities of Y. enterocolitica Ye9. However, the loss of motility in the ompR strain was apparently not responsible for its low adhesion ability. When the nonmotile phenotype of the ompR mutant was artificially eliminated, an elevated level of invasion, exceeding that of the wild-type strain, was observed. Confocal laser microscopy demonstrated a decrease in the biofilm formation ability of the ompR strain that was only partially correlated with its loss of motility. These data provide evidence that OmpR promotes biofilm formation in this particular strain of Y. enterocolitica, although additional OmpR-dependent factors are also required. In addition, our findings suggest that OmpR-dependent regulation of biofilm formation could be an additional aspect of OmpR regulatory function.
The environmental control of invasin (inv) expression in Yersinia enterocolitica is mediated by a regulatory network composed of negative and positive regulators of inv gene transcription. Previously, we demonstrated that OmpR, a response regulator of the two-component signal transduction pathway EnvZ/OmpR, negatively regulates inv gene expression in Y. enterocolitica O9 by direct interaction with the inv promoter region. This study was undertaken to clarify the role of OmpR in the inv regulatory circuit in which RovA protein has been shown to positively regulate inv transcription. Using ompR, rovA, and ompR rovA Y. enterocolitica mutant backgrounds we showed that the inhibitory effect of OmpR on inv transcription may be observed only when RovA is present/active in Y. enterocolitica cells. To extend our research on inv regulation we examined the effect of OmpR on rovA gene expression. Analysis of rovA-lacZ transcriptional fusion in Y. enterocolitica wild-type and ompR background indicated that OmpR does not influence rovA expression. Thus, our results indicate that OmpR influences inv expression directly via binding to the inv promoter, but not through modulation of rovA expression.
To elucidate the physiological meaning of OmpR-dependent expression of invasin gene (inv) inhibition in Yersinia enterocolitica, the function of the EnvZ/OmpR regulatory pathway in osmoregulation of inv expression was analyzed in detail. The osmoregulation of inv expression was found to be a multifaceted process involving both OmpR-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Analysis of inv transcription in strains lacking OmpR or EnvZ proteins indicated that kinase EnvZ is not the only regulator of OmpR phosphorylation. Using the transcriptional inv::lacZ fusion in a heterologous system (Escherichia coli) we tried to clarify the role of OmpR in the inv regulatory circuit composed of negative (H-NS) and positive (RovA) regulators of inv gene transcription. We were able to show a significant increase in inv expression in E. coli ompR background under H-NS( Ecoli )-repressed condition. Moreover, H-NS-mediated inv repression was relieved when RovA of Y. enterocolitica was expressed from a plasmid. Furthermore, we showed that RovA may activate inv expression irrespective on the presence of H-NS protein. Using this strategy we showed that OmpR of Y. enterocolitica decrease RovA-mediated inv activation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.