2Recent interest in analytical pluralism -the application of more than one qualitative 3 analytical method to a single data set -has demonstrated its potential to produce multiple, 4 complex and varied understandings of phenomena. However tensions remain regarding the 5 commensurability of findings produced from diverse theoretical frameworks, the practical 6 application of multiple methods of analysis and the capacity of pluralism to contribute to 7 knowledge in psychology. This study addresses these issues, through a critical interpretation 8 of existing qualitative studies that utilised analytical pluralism. Using a meta-study design, 9we examined the use of theory, application of methods and production of findings in studies 10 that had adopted qualitative analytical pluralism. Following comprehensive database 11 searches, 10 articles were included in the analysis. Epistemological and ontological 12 considerations, the influence of decisions made in the practical application of pluralism and 13 approaches to interpreting findings produced from multiple analyses are discussed, and 14 implications for future research are considered. 15 16

The current age of 'austerity' is associated with neoliberal ideology. Neoliberalism can be understood as a form of governmentality -a way of reconfiguring selves and the social order in accord with the demands of market economies. A recent UK policy initiative by the Coalition government's Behavioural Insights Team required benefits claimants to submit to online psychometric testing. We examine this policy in some detail, arguing that this use of psychometric testing is flawed, unethical, and unlikely to help claimants to find work. Our analysis of the test procedure and its results suggests that the policy functions primarily as a means whereby benefit claimants can be 'nudged' towards acceptance of the precepts of neoliberal subjectivities.

No abstract

Clubhouses are recovery orientated, participatory communities in which people with mental health diagnoses can take part in the running of the clubhouse. The objective of this research was to produce the first qualitative study of its kind, examining how the clubhouse model of mental health recovery is perceived and experienced by young adults aged 16-25. Five participants provided lengthy and detailed semi-structured interviews regarding their experiences as members of a clubhouse in London. Analysis produced themes including mixed age services as a distinct benefit, the benefits of getting involved in the work of the clubhouse, the mostly positive perception of the clubhouse compared with other mental health services, and the sense of personal change and social improvement experienced on becoming members of the clubhouse. While further research is needed, it was concluded that the clubhouse model was beneficial to all its young members, for reasons including its entirely collaborative and consultative process between staff and members, its humanitarian approach, its lack of rigid or inflexible time limits, and its reciprocal relationships, where members are expected to both provide and receive support.

No abstract