BackgroundFine needle aspiration (FNA) is the procedure of choice in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Nodules with indeterminate cytological categories, Bethesda III and IV, pose challenges in clinical practice and are frequently submitted to diagnostic surgery. CytoFoam Core (CFCS) uses an absorbent foam device inserted into the needle hub to collect the cytological sample aspirated during FNA. Specimen is formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded.Aim of the studyAssessing diagnostic efficacy of CFCS, compared to traditional cytology, in re-evaluating thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda III, using post-surgical histology as reference standard.MethodRetrospective study on 89 patients with a first indeterminate cytological report who were referred to the Department of Endocrinology of Regina Apostolorum Hospital (Albano L. Rome, Italy) for a second FNA. FNA was performed after at least one month under ultrasound guidance with a 23G needle according to the established procedure. During the second procedure, both traditional cytological (TC) smears and a single-pass CFCS specimen were obtained for each patient. On CFCS samples immunocytochemical staining for Galectin-3, HBME-1, and CK-19 was also performed. 51 patients eventually underwent surgery, and their histological diagnoses were compared to the TC and CFCS reports. Four parameters were evaluated: inadequacy rate, rate of persistent indeterminate (Bethesda III and IV) reports, rate of malignancy in persistently indeterminate nodules, and rate of cancer in lesions cytologically classified as malignant.ResultsNon-diagnostic samples were 6 (11.8%) in TC vs 3 (5.9%) in CFCS (p=0.4). Persistent indeterminate samples were 31 (60.8%) in TC vs 19 (37.2%) in CFCS (p=0.01). Rate of malignancy in persistently indeterminate nodules was 8/19 (42.1%) in CFCS vs 9/31 (29%) in TC group (p=0.3). Nine/51 (17.6%) samples were classified as benign by TC vs 21/51 (41.2%) samples by CFCS (p<0.01). All nodules resulted benign at post-surgical evaluation. Five/51 (9.8%) samples were classified as suspicious for malignancy/malignant in TC group against 8/51 (15.7%) samples in CFCS (p=0.5). Post-surgical evaluation confirmed malignancy in all these cases.ConclusionCFCS demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy than TC in repeat FNA assessment of cytologically indeterminate nodules. CFCS increased the conclusive diagnosis rate and decreased the number of cytologically indeterminate cases.
The increased frequency of thyroid nodules is paralleled by the rise of thyroid cancer diagnosis. To define the nature of most thyroid nodules, fine needle aspiration (FNA) followed by cytological evaluation is considered the method of choice. About 20% of FNA biopsies on thyroid nodules, however, show indeterminate cytological features and may require diagnostic surgery. Several immunocytochemical and molecular markers have been proposed to improve classification of thyroid nodules, but these tests require adequate cell amount and cytological paraffin inclusion. Polymeric matrices were recently proposed for the collection of cells for diagnostic purposes. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic use of a new matrix (CytoMatrix). Morphological, molecular and immunohistochemical investigations were carried out on 23 FNA samples included in CytoMatrix and compared with data obtained from the definitive histology of surgical samples. Our results showed that CytoMatrix is suitable to capture and preserve the cellularity of the samples harvested by FNA and that its paraffin sections mimic the morphology of those obtained from real histological tissue. Immunohistochemistry on CytoMatrix samples was consistent with the immunophenotypical profile of the corresponding histological surgical specimens. Mutational analysis of the BRAF (V600E) gene performed on CytoMatrix inclusions and paired surgical tissue matched in all but one cases while matrix immunohistochemistry identified 91.6% of BRAF mutated samples. In conclusion, we suggest that CytoMatrix could be a reliable tool to overcome the current limits of traditional collection methods for the study of thyroid cytology, thereby improving their reliability for a conclusive diagnostic interpretation.
Purpose. Thermal ablations (TA) are gaining ground as alternative options to conventional therapies for symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. Little is known about the impact of nodule biology on the outcomes of TA. The aim of our study was to evaluate the baseline immunocytochemistry profile of thyroid nodules that were poorly responsive to TA in order to identify potential predictors of the treatment response. Methods. From a cohort of 406 patients with benign thyroid nodules treated with TA and followed for 5 years, we retrospectively selected two groups of patients: NONRESPONDERS (patients who did not respond to TA and were later surgically treated) and RESPONDERS (patients who responded to TA). The fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) slides obtained before TA were stained for Galectin-3, HBME-1, CK-19, and Ki-67. Results. Benign nodules of NONRESPONDERS (n = 19) did not express CK-19 ( p = 0.03 ), as compared to RESPONDERS (n = 26). We combined the absence of CK-19 and the presence of Ki-67 to obtain a composite biomarker of resistance to TA, which discriminated between likelihood of retreatment and no retreatment with an AUC of 0.68 (95%CI: 0.55-0.81) and a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 29%, 91%, 71%, and 64%, respectively. Conclusion. In benign thyroid nodules, the absence of CK-19 was associated with resistance to TA, while the presence of CK-19 was predictive of response to TA. If confirmed, this finding could provide rapid and inexpensive information about the potential outcome of TA on benign thyroid nodules. In addition, as CK-19 can be expressed in adenomatous hyperplasia, it could be speculated that these nodules, rather than follicular adenomas, might be better candidates for TA.
In contrast to previously published studies, we found no correlation of p53 expression to either tumor stage at presentation (p >0.3) or prognosis (p >0.3) in individuals with histologically favorable Wilms tumor assessed for immunopositivity before administration of chemotherapy.
Introduction:We report a case of a 64-year old man with a history of colon carcinoma. He underwent fine-needle aspiration by CytoFoam-core and diagnosis of metastatic colon cancer to the thyroid gland. Case presentation: In this case report, a solid thyroid nodule in the right lobe of a 64-year-old male was aspirated. The cytological smears showed a small group of atypical cells with the obvious nucleolus, necrosis, and atypical tall columnar cells. Since the patient had undergone surgery for rectal cancer at age 63, suspicion of metastasis from colon cancer was raised. This was corroborated by CytoFoam-core immunocytochemistry; showing a positive staining pattern for caudal type homeobox transcription factor 2 (cd×2) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20); while thyroglobulin (TG) and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) were both negative. Conclusion:The main objective was to correctly identify the metastatic thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and exclude other clinical entities as primary diseases of the thyroid gland. Cytology plays a crucial role in the follow-up and the therapeutic management of the patients. The CytoFoam-core preparations were diagnostic of metastatic colon cancer to the thyroid gland. In this context, the CytoFoam-core could be of great help, especially in previous oncologic history cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.