ObjectivePulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and progressive respiratory disease characterised by high blood pressure and vascular resistance producing right ventricular fatigue. In Italy, pulmonary hypertension can be treated with different drugs available on the market at different costs, and in the Marche region distributed exclusively by hospital pharmacies. The present study examined in an area of the Marche region the use of drugs specifically indicated for pulmonary hypertension, and evaluated how the introduction of the generic bosentan might lower pharmaceutical costs for the healthcare budget.MethodsThe study examined oral administration prescriptions and costs using data from the Apotheke Gold (Record Data) database from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2017.ResultsAnnually (from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2017), an average of 4.83 patients were treated (prevalence of 102.35 cases per 1 million residents) with ambrisentan (Volibris), bosentan (Tracleer), macitentan (Opsumit), tadalafil (Adcirca) or sildenafil (Revatio). The total expenditure during the 5-year 8-month period was €472 405. Ambrisentan was by far the most expensive product overall, with a total expenditure of €222 380 for the period studied (a daily cost of €67.39), even though Tracleer had the highest cost for a day of treatment (a daily cost of €94.48, but a total expenditure of €163 976 for the period, due to its more recent marketing). Providing patients with the generic form bosentan in place of Tracleer would lower the costs dramatically. A very significant annual savings per patient of approximately €31 879 would be achieved, a striking 92.4% reduction in costs.ConclusionThe prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension reported for Camerino and its surrounding area in the Marches region is quite high compared with that reported by other authors for France and Scotland. The introduction of the generic bosentan would cut costs drastically. It is to be hoped that centralised procurement at the regional level would bring further savings.

Inertial technology has spread widely for its comfortable use and adaptability to various motor tasks. The main objective of this study was to assess the validity of inertial measurements of the cervical spine range of motion (CROM) when compared to that of the optoelectronic system in a group of healthy individuals. A further aim of this study was to determine the optimal placement of the inertial sensor in terms of reliability of the measure, comparing measurements obtained from the same device placed at the second cervical vertebra (C2), the forehead (F) and the external occipital protuberance (EOP). Twenty healthy subjects were recruited and asked to perform flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation movements of the head. Outcome measurements of interest were CROM and mean angular velocities for each cervical movement. Results showed that inertial measurements have good reliability (0.75 < ICC < 0.9). Excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9) was found in both flexion and right lateral bending angles. All parameters extracted with EOP placement showed ICC > 0.62, while ICC < 0.5 was found in lateral bending mean angular velocities both for F and C2 placements. Therefore, the optimal sensor’s positioning emerged to be EOP. These results suggest that inertial technology could be useful and reliable for the evaluation of the CROM.