[Purpose] Determining the thickness of the intercostal muscle with ultrasound imaging would be a useful parameter in evaluating respiratory muscle activity in patients with tetraplegia and neuromuscular weakness. However, it has not been clarified whether ultrasound imaging can measure changes in intercostal muscle thickness during breathing. This study aimed to measure contractions of the human intercostal muscle in the anterior, lateral, and posterior parts with ultrasound imaging during maximal breathing. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 12 healthy males. Intercostal muscle thickness was measured using ultrasound at rest and at maximal breathing. The measurement sites were the anterior, lateral, and posterior portions of the right intercostal spaces. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test comparing intercostal muscle thickness at rest and maximal breathing. [Results] The thickness of the intercostal muscle showed significant increases in the first, second, third, fourth, and sixth intercostal spaces of the anterior portions. There were no significant differences in the lateral or posterior portions between rest and maximal breathing. [Conclusion] Human intercostal muscle thickness can be measured with ultrasound and increases only in the anterior portions during maximal breathing.
Background: During shoulder abduction and external rotation, internal impingement can occur when compressive forces between the greater tuberosity and the posterior glenoid rim pinch the undersurface of the rotator cuff. Previous studies on internal impingement have focused on qualitative results such as pathological findings; however, few studies have quantified the area of impingement (AOI) of the rotator cuff muscles between the greater tuberosity and the posterior glenoid rim. Purpose: To compare the AOI between the throwing and nonthrowing shoulders of baseball players. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 14 asymptomatic male collegiate baseball players participated in this study. The AOI in both the throwing and the nonthrowing shoulders was calculated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The MRI measurements were collected with the shoulder at 90° of abduction and at 90° and 100° of external rotation. The area, width, and depth of impingement as well as cystic changes in the greater tuberosity and degeneration in the posterior labrum were compared between the throwing and nonthrowing shoulders. Results: The AOI was significantly greater in the throwing shoulders than in the nonthrowing shoulders (90° of external rotation: 32.4 vs 19.1 mm2, respectively; 100° of external rotation, 28.0 vs 15.6 mm2, respectively; P < .001 for both). Compared with the nonthrowing shoulders, there were more positive findings in the throwing shoulders regarding greater tuberosity cystic changes (0 vs 7, respectively; P = .006) and posterior labral degeneration (3 vs 13, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion: The AOI and the number of lesions in the greater tuberosity and posterior labrum were greater in throwing shoulders than in nonthrowing shoulders. Therefore, damage to the insertion of the rotator cuff muscles may affect internal impingement. Clinical Relevance: Lesions in the greater tuberosity and posterior labrum in throwing shoulders may increase the AOI by expanding the joint gap behind the glenohumeral joint. Impingement of the greater tuberosity and the posterior glenoid rim may lead to rotator cuff tears.
The objective of this study was to quantitatively analyze differences in diaphragmatic motion between supine and prone positioning during resting breathing using dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Total diaphragmatic motion (TDM), defined as total excursion of the anterior (ANT), central (CNT), and posterior (PST) diaphragm, was 61 mm in the supine position and 63 mm in the prone position. No significant difference in TDM was apparent in response to change in positioning. Diaphragmatic motion was greatest in the PST > CNT > ANT with supine positioning, and PST > ANT ≈ CNT with prone positioning. In both positions, motion tended to be greatest in the posterior diaphragm. However, relative changes in CNT and PST were less with prone than with supine positioning. These findings suggest that ventilation in the posterior lung fields is decreased to a greater extent with prone than with supine positioning.
Purpose: Signal intensity and image contrast differ between postmortem magnetic resonance (PMMR) images and images acquired from the living body. We sought to achieve sufficient fat suppression with short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) PMMR imaging by optimizing inversion time (TI).Material and Methods: We subjected 37 deceased adult patients to PMMR imaging at 1.5 tesla 8 to 60 hours after confirmation of death and measured T 1 values of areas of subcutaneous fat with relaxation time maps. Rectal temperature (RT) measured immediately after PMMR ranged from 6 to 31°C. We used Pearson's correlation coefficient to analyze the relationship between T 1 and relaxation time (RT). We compared STIR images from 4 cadavers acquired with a TI commonly used in the living body and another TI calculated from the linear regression of T 1 and RT.Results: T 1 values of subcutaneous fat ranged from 89.4 to 182.2 ms. There was a strong, positive, and significant correlation between T 1 and RT (r = 0.91, P < 0.0001). The regression expression for the relationship was T 1 = 2.6*RT + 90 at a field strength of 1.5T. The subcutaneous fat signal was suppressed more effectively with the optimized TI.Conclusion: The T 1 value of subcutaneous fat in PMMR correlates linearly with body temperature. Using this correlation to determine TI, fat suppression with PMMR STIR imaging can be easily improved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.