To understand which growth factors/cytokines can affect migration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to injured tissues, we compared the effects of many (26) growth factors/cytokines on the migration activity of rabbit and human MSCs using a microchemotaxis chamber. Among them, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, PDGF-AB, epidermal growth factor (EGF), HB-EGF, transforming growth factor (TGF-alpha), insulin growth factor (IGF-I), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2), and thrombin consistently enhanced the migration of rabbit and human MSCs at appropriate concentrations. PDGF-BB showed the greatest effect on migration. Various combinations of these factors further enhanced the migration of MSCs, whereas combinations of factors that shared common cell-surface receptors did not induce the additive stimulation. On the other hand, some combinations, including that of FGF-2 or thrombin with PDGF-BB, suppressed the migration activity of MSCs. These findings suggest that combinations of growth factors are important to eliciting the maximal chemotactic effect. The factors that induced the migration of MSCs also enhanced their proliferation, suggesting that migration and proliferation can take place simultaneously. The above factors were also effective in stimulating the migration of fibroblasts, but thrombin alone selectively enhanced the migration of MSCs, suggesting that thrombin is useful to stimulate migration of MSCs without migration of fibroblasts.

Serum used in culture medium brings risks of immune reactions or infections and thus may hinder using ex vivo expanded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for medical treatment. Here, we cultured MSCs in a serum‐free medium (SF‐MSCs) and in a medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (10%MSCs) and investigated their effects on inflammation and fibrosis. MSC‐conditioned medium suppressed transforming growth factor‐β1–induced phosphorylation of Smad2 in HK‐2 cells, with no significant difference between the two MSCs. This finding suggests that the direct antifibrotic effect of SF‐MSCs is similar to that of 10%MSCs. However, immunohistochemistry revealed that renal fibrosis induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats was more significantly ameliorated by the administration of SF‐MSCs than by that of 10%MSCs. Coculture of MSCs and monocytic THP‐1 cell‐derived macrophages using a Transwell system showed that SF‐MSCs significantly induced polarization from the proinflammatory M1 to the immunosuppressive M2 phenotype macrophages, suggesting that SF‐MSCs strongly suppress the persistence of inflammation. Furthermore, the gene expression of tumor necrosis factor‐α–induced protein 6 (TSG‐6), which inhibits the recruitment of inflammatory cells, was higher in SF‐MSCs than in 10%MSCs, and TSG‐6 knockdown in SF‐MSCs attenuated the anti‐inflammatory responses in unilateral ureteral obstruction rats. These findings imply that SF culture conditions can enhance the immunosuppressive and antifibrotic abilities of MSCs and the administration of ex vivo expanded SF‐MSCs has the potential to be a useful therapy for preventing the progression of renal fibrosis. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:893–905

Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are valuable in tissue engineering and cell therapy, but the quality of the cells is critical for the efficacy of therapy. To test the quality and identity of transplantable cells, we identified the molecular markers that were expressed at higher levels in BMSCs than in fibroblasts. Using numerous BMSC lines from tibia, femur, ilium, and jaw, together with skin and gum fibroblasts, we compared the gene expression profiles of these cells using DNA microarrays and low-density array cards. The differentiation potential of tibia and femur BMSCs was similar to that of iliac BMSCs, and different from jaw BMSCs, but all BMSC lines had many common markers that were expressed at much higher levels in BMSCs than in fibroblasts; several BMSC markers showed discrete expression patterns between jaw and other BMSCs. The common markers are probably useful in routine tests, but their efficacy may depend upon the passage number or donor age. In our study the passage number markedly altered the expression levels of several markers, while donor age had little effect on them. Considering the effects of in vivo location of BMSCs and passage, magnitude of increase in expression levels, and interindividual differences, we identified several reliable markers -- LIF, IGF1, PRG1, MGP, BMP4, CTGF, KCTD12, IGFBP7, TRIB2, and DYNC1I1 -- among many candidates. This marker set may be useful in a routine test for BMSCs in tissue engineering and cell therapy.

No abstract

The precise predictions of the differentiation direction and potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an important key to the success of regenerative medicine. The expression levels of fate-determining genes may provide tools for predicting differentiation potential. The expression levels of 95 candidate marker genes and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) contents after chondrogenic induction in 10 undifferentiated ilium and 5 jaw MSC cultures were determined, and their correlations were analyzed. The expression levels of eight genes before the induction of chondrogenic MSC differentiation were significantly correlated with the GAG levels after induction. Based on correlation patterns, the eight genes were classified into two groups: group 1 genes (AURKB, E2F1, CDKN2D, LIF, and ACLY), related to cell cycle regulation, and group 2 genes (CD74, EFEMP1, and TGM2), involved in chondrogenesis. The expression levels of the group 2 genes were significantly correlated with the ages of the cell donors. The expression levels of CDKN2D, CD74, and TGM2 were >10-fold higher in highly potent MSCs (ilium MSCs) than in MSCs with limited potential (jaw MSCs). Three-dimensional (3D) scatter plot analyses of the expression levels of these genes showed reduced variability between donors and confirmed predictive potential. These data suggest that group 2 genes are involved in age-dependent decreases in the chondrogenic differentiation potential of MSCs, and combined 3D analyses of the expression profiles of three genes, including two group 2 genes, were predictive of MSC differentiation potential.