Lung cancer risk among exsmokers according to years since cessation of smoking was assessed by means of a case‐control study. The case series consisted of 1,052 lung cancer patients who were newly diagnosed and admitted to eight hospitals in Osaka in 1986–88. Smoking histories were compared with those of 1,111 controls admitted to the same hospitals during the same period without any diagnosis of smoking‐related disease. The odds ratio of lung cancer for exsmokers compared to current smokers was estimated to be 0.90, 0.50, 0.51, 0.59, 0.48 and 0.29, for 1–4, 5–9,10–14,15 19, 20 24 and ± 25 years after cessation of smoking, respectively. Risk reduction appeared to be greater for those who smoked less than the 1200 cigarette index, compared to those who smoked more. In classification according to histologic type, small cell and large cell carcinoma showed a rapid decrease compared to adenocarcinoma, while squamous cell carcinoma showed an intermediate pattern. Quantitative estimates for reduction of lung cancer risk among exsmokers can be used for projecting lung cancer incidence in the future, by assuming future trends of smoking prevalence, as well as for health education among individual smokers.
Lung cancer incidence rate after the cessation of smoking was assessed for male ex‐smokers according to the age at cessation, using the results from a case‐control study for ex‐smoker versus continuing smoker, and the lung cancer incidence rate function for continuing smoker estimated from Japan Vital Statistics and the “Six‐prefectural Cohort Study” in Japan. This hospital‐based case‐control study consisted of 776 lung cancer cases (553 current smokers and 223 ex‐smokers) and 772 controls (490 current smokers and 282 ex‐smokers) who started smoking at ages 18–22. The odds ratio of developing lung cancer for ex‐smokers compared to continuing smokers according to years since the cessation of smoking was estimated for four age groups (55–64, 60–69, 65–74 and 70–79). Given that the number of years since cessation of smoking is the same, reduction of the odds ratio appeared to be greater for the younger age group than for the older age group, reflecting the shorter period of exposure for the younger age group. Lung cancer incidence rate (per 100,000) was assumed to be expressed by the following function; 1.7 × 10−5× (age – 24.3)4,5 for continuing smokers and 0.15 × 10−5× (age)4 for nonsmokers. Lung cancer incidence rate among ex‐smokers according to years since cessation was then estimated to be the above function multiplied by the odds ratio from the case‐control study for each age group. In contrast to the greater reduction of the odds ratio among younger ex‐smokers, reduction of the incidence rate, in terms of rate difference, was considerably greater for older ex‐smokers due to a high incidence rate of lung cancer for older continuing smokers. This indicates that the absolute magnitude of reduction of the lung cancer incidence rate after cessation of smoking is greater for older ex‐smokers, although the relative magnitude of reduction is greater for younger ex‐smokers.
This report describes a female patient with myasthenia gravis who developed respiratory failure due to vocal cord paresis. The diagnosis was delayed due to the absence of other myasthenic symptoms (e.g. ptosis, muscle weakness and dysphagia). On direct laryngoscopy, her vocal cords were seen to be in the paramedian position and to move apart after the intravenous injection of edrophonium. The patient initially presented with ocular myasthenia and later returned with isolated respiratory failure. A review of the pertinent literature revealed few reports on myasthenia gravis presenting in this manner.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.