The molecular motor kinesin travels processively along a microtubule in a stepwise manner. Here we have studied the chemomechanical coupling of the hydrolysis of ATP to the mechanical work of kinesin by analysing the individual stepwise movements according to the directionality of the movements. Kinesin molecules move primarily in the forward direction and only occasionally in the backward direction. The hydrolysis of a single ATP molecule is coupled to either the forward or the backward movement. This bidirectional movement is well described by a model of Brownian motion assuming an asymmetric potential of activation energy. Thus, the stepwise movement along the microtubule is most probably due to Brownian motion that is biased towards the forward direction by chemical energy stored in ATP molecules.

Kinesin is a molecular motor that moves processively by regular 8-nm steps along microtubules. The processivity of this movement is explained by a hand-over-hand model in which the two heads of kinesin work in a coordinated manner. One head remains bound to the microtubule while the other steps from the alphabeta-tubulin dimer behind the attached head to the dimer in front. The overall movement is 8 nm per ATPase cycle. To investigate elementary processes within the 8-nm step, we have developed a new assay that resolves nanometre displacements of single kinesin molecules with microsecond accuracy. Our data show that the 8-nm step can be resolved into fast and slow substeps, each corresponding to a displacement of approximately 4 nm. The substeps are most probably generated by structural changes in one head of kinesin, leading to rectified forward thermal motions of the partner head. It is also possible that the kinesin steps along the 4-nm repeat of tubulin monomers.

Kinesin is a stepping motor that successively produces forward and backward 8-nm steps along microtubules. Under physiological conditions, the steps powering kinesin's motility are biased in one direction and drive various biological motile processes. The physical mechanism underlying the unidirectional bias of the kinesin steps is not fully understood. Here we explored the mechanical kinetics and thermodynamics of forward and backward kinesin steps by analyzing their temperature and load dependence. Results show that the frequency asymmetry between forward and backward steps is produced by entropy. Furthermore, the magnitude of the entropic asymmetry is 6 k(B)T, more than three times greater than expected from a current model, in which a mechanical conformational change within the kinesin molecular structure directly biases the kinesin steps forward. We propose that the stepping direction of kinesin is preferably caused by an entropy asymmetry resulting from the compatibility between the kinesin and microtubule interaction based on their polar structures.

Motility often plays a decisive role in the survival of species. Five systems of motility have been studied in depth: those propelled by bacterial flagella, eukaryotic actin polymerization and the eukaryotic motor proteins myosin, kinesin and dynein. However, many organisms exhibit surprisingly diverse motilities, and advances in genomics, molecular biology and imaging have showed that those motilities have inherently independent mechanisms. This makes defining the breadth of motility nontrivial, because novel motilities may be driven by unknown mechanisms. Here, we classify the known motilities based on the unique classes of movement-producing protein architectures.Based on this criterion, the current total of independent motility systems stands at 18 types. In this perspective, we discuss these modes of motility relative to the latest phylogenetic Tree of Life and propose a history of motility. During the ~4 billion years since the emergence of life, motility arose in Bacteria with flagella and pili, and in Archaea with archaella. Newer modes of motility became possible in Eukarya with changes to the cell envelope. Presence or absence of a peptidoglycan layer, the acquisition of robust membrane dynamics, the enlargement of cells and environmental opportunities likely provided the context for the (co)evolution of novel types of motility. K E Y W O R D S appendage, cytoskeleton, flagella, membrane remodeling, Mollicutes, motor protein, peptidoglycan, three domains | 9Genes to Cells MIYATA eT Al.