Like other self-conscious emotions, shame takes on particular significance during late childhood and adolescence due to a developing capacity for self-reflection, self-other comparisons, and sensitivity to the views of others. Shame is a potentially important variable in adolescent wellbeing given its established associations with depression, reduced feelings of self-worth, and problematic anger. Three studies are reported that describe the development and validation of the Adolescent Shame-Proneness Scale (ASPS), a novel semi-idiographic measure of shame-proneness. The ASPS is a 19-item measure assessing three components of shame-proneness -negative self-evaluation, externalisation, and emotional discomfort.Taken together, the studies support the reliability and validity of the ASPS as a semiidiographic measure of shame-proneness in adolescents aged 11 to 18 years. ASPS scores correlate as expected with scores on existing measure of shame-proneness and with measures of anger, negative affect and self-esteem. Importantly, the data suggest that ASPS scores are related to, but distinct from, guilt. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the validity of the ASPS factor structure (RMSEA=.08, SRMR=.05, CFI=.97, NNFI=.97). The ASPS represents a unique contribution to existing options for measuring shame-proneness in research and clinical contexts. Further work is required to assess the ASPS' temporal stability and its viability and psychometric properties in more culturally diverse samples.
Despite the evidence linking chronic early trauma with psychological distress, the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) has excluded developmental trauma disorder from its taxonomy. This article considers developmental trauma from an attachment-based perspective and raises some of the difficulties professionals may experience conceptualising the trauma-attachment relationship. It explores the impact of the decision to exclude the diagnosis from DSM-5 on professionals, those who have had traumatic early experiences and their carers. Finally, it presents formulation as an alternative proposition which may better suit those who present to mental health services with attachment- and trauma-linked difficulties.
Study Objectives: Poor sleep quality, particularly insomnia, has been identifi ed as a frequent problem among individuals with mental health diffi culties. Comorbid sleep diffi culties adversely affect quality of life and functioning, and have been associated with the causation and maintenance of a number of psychiatric disorders, as well as increasing the risk of relapse. The study objectives were to ascertain clinician knowledge related to insomnia, investigate sleep quality among service users in a community mental health setting in the UK, and evaluate service provision of evidence-based interventions for sleep diffi culties. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Nineteen clinicians completed a questionnaire on their clinical practice. Seventy-three service users completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and provided self-report data on interventions received and associated satisfaction. Results: Clinical staff demonstrated defi cits in knowledge of insomnia symptomatology. Sixty-four percent (95% CI 54% to 74%) of service users were identifi ed as poor sleepers on the PSQI. Sixty-one percent of poor sleepers had not been offered support for sleep diffi culties. The most common support received was prescribed psychotropic medication (32%). Cognitive behavioral therapy was the intervention rated as most helpful but was only received by 6%. Conclusions: This study highlights inadequacies in providing evidence-based interventions for sleep diffi culties. Key recommendations include training clinicians in the identifi cation of sleep diffi culties and provision of evidencebased interventions, provision of cost-effective transdiagnostic group interventions, and formalizing assessment and treatment pathways for service users with sleep diffi culties.
Background. Shame has been associated with a range of maladaptive behaviours, including substance use. Young people may be particularly vulnerable to heightened shame sensitivity, and substance use is a significant problem amongst UK adolescents. Although there appears to be a relationship between shame and substance use, the direction of the relationship remains unclear.Aim. The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the literature relating to shame and substance use in young people.Method. Five electronic databases were searched for articles containing terms related to ‘adolescence,’ ‘shame’ and ‘substance use.’ Six articles were included in the final analyses.Results. Adverse early experiences, particularly sexual abuse, predict shame-proneness, and substance use is a mechanism by which some individuals cope with negative feelings. In general, there is a dearth of literature investigating the shame-substance use relationship in adolescent samples. The available literature associates shame-proneness with poorer functioning and suggests that it may potentially lead to psychopathology and early-onset substance use. Scant attention has been paid to the cognitive and emotional processes implicated. Further research is required to ascertain the strength of the shame-substance use relationship in young people and to develop appropriate interventions for this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.