No abstract

In drug invention and early disease prediction of lung cancer, metabolomic biomarker detection is very important. Mortality rate can be decreased, if cancer is predicted at the earlier stage. Recent diagnostic techniques for lung cancer are not prognosis diagnostic techniques. However, if we know the name of the metabolites, whose intensity levels are considerably changing between cancer subject and control subject, then it will be easy to early diagnosis the disease as well as to discover the drug. Therefore, in this paper we have identified the influential plasma and serum blood sample metabolites for lung cancer and also identified the biomarkers that will be helpful for early disease prediction as well as for drug invention. To identify the influential metabolites, we considered a parametric and a nonparametric test namely student׳s t-test as parametric and Kruskal-Wallis test as non-parametric test. We also categorized the up-regulated and down-regulated metabolites by the heatmap plot and identified the biomarkers by support vector machine (SVM) classifier and pathway analysis. From our analysis, we got 27 influential (p-value<0.05) metabolites from plasma sample and 13 influential (p-value<0.05) metabolites from serum sample. According to the importance plot through SVM classifier, pathway analysis and correlation network analysis, we declared 4 metabolites (taurine, aspertic acid, glutamine and pyruvic acid) as plasma biomarker and 3 metabolites (aspartic acid, taurine and inosine) as serum biomarker.

Background and objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world, but early diagnosis ameliorates the survival of CRC. This report aimed to identify molecular biomarker signatures in CRC. Materials and Methods: We analyzed two microarray datasets (GSE35279 and GSE21815) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to identify mutual differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We integrated DEGs with protein–protein interaction and transcriptional/post-transcriptional regulatory networks to identify reporter signaling and regulatory molecules; utilized functional overrepresentation and pathway enrichment analyses to elucidate their roles in biological processes and molecular pathways; performed survival analyses to evaluate their prognostic performance; and applied drug repositioning analyses through Connectivity Map (CMap) and geneXpharma tools to hypothesize possible drug candidates targeting reporter molecules. Results: A total of 727 upregulated and 99 downregulated DEGs were detected. The PI3K/Akt signaling, Wnt signaling, extracellular matrix (ECM) interaction, and cell cycle were identified as significantly enriched pathways. Ten hub proteins (ADNP, CCND1, CD44, CDK4, CEBPB, CENPA, CENPH, CENPN, MYC, and RFC2), 10 transcription factors (ETS1, ESR1, GATA1, GATA2, GATA3, AR, YBX1, FOXP3, E2F4, and PRDM14) and two microRNAs (miRNAs) (miR-193b-3p and miR-615-3p) were detected as reporter molecules. The survival analyses through Kaplan–Meier curves indicated remarkable performance of reporter molecules in the estimation of survival probability in CRC patients. In addition, several drug candidates including anti-neoplastic and immunomodulating agents were repositioned. Conclusions: This study presents biomarker signatures at protein and RNA levels with prognostic capability in CRC. We think that the molecular signatures and candidate drugs presented in this study might be useful in future studies indenting the development of accurate diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker screens and efficient therapeutic strategies in CRC.

Background: Alzheimers disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by memory loss and confusion. Neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid-based early detection is limited in sensitivity and specificity as well as by cost. Therefore, detecting AD from blood cell analysis could improve early diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The present study aimed to identify blood cell transcripts that reflect brain expression levels of factors linked to AD progression. Methods: We analyzed blood cell and brain microarray gene expression datasets from NCBI-GEO for AD association and expression in blood and brain. We also used eQTL and epigenetics data to identify AD-related genes that were regulated similarly in blood and brain. Results: We identified 9 differentially expressed genes (DEG; AD versus controls) common to blood cells and brain (CNBD1, SUCLG2-AS1, CCDC65, PDE4D, MTMR1, C3, SLC6A15, LINC01806, and FRG1JP) and 18 genes (HSD17B1, GAS5, RPS5, VKORC1, GLE1, WDR1, RPL12, MORN1, RAD52, SDR39U1, NPHP4, MT1E, SORD, LINC00638, MCM3AP-AS1, GSDMD, RPS9, and GNL2) that were commonly dysregulated between AD blood and brain tissues using SNP and cis-eQTL data. This data revealed significant neurodegeneration-associated molecular pathways in the ribosomal and complement systems. Integration of these different analyses revealed dysregulation of hub transcription factors (SREBF2, NR1H2, NR1H3, PRDM1, XBP1) and microRNAs (miR-518e, miR-518a-3p, miR-518b, miR-518c, miR-518d-3p and miR-518f) in AD. Several significant histone modification sites in DEGs were also identified. Conclusion: We have identified new putative links between pathological processes in brain and transcripts in blood cells in AD subjects that may enable the use of blood to diagnose and monitor AD onset and progression.

Background and objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world, but early diagnosis ameliorates the survival of CRC. This report directed to identify molecular biomarker signatures in CRC. Materials and Methods: We analyzed two microarray datasets (GSE35279 and GSE21815) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to identify mutual differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We integrated DEGs with protein-protein interaction and transcriptional/post-transcriptional regulatory networks to identify reporter signaling and regulatory molecules; utilized functional overrepresentation and pathway enrichment analyses to elucidate their roles in biological processes and molecular pathways; performed survival analyses to evaluate their prognostic performance; and applied drug repositioning analyses through Connectivity map (CMap) and geneXpharma tools to hypothesize possible drug candidates targeting reporter molecules. Results: A total of 727 up-regulated and 99 down-regulated DEGs were detected. The PI3K-Akt signaling, Wnt signaling, ECM-interaction, and cell cycle were identified as significantly enriched pathways. Ten hub proteins (ADNP, CCND1, CD44, CDK4, CEBPB, CENPA, CENPH, CENPN, MYC, and RFC2), 10 transcription factors (ETS1, ESR1, GATA1, GATA2, GATA3, AR, YBX1, FOXP3, E2F4, and PRDM14) and 2 miRNAs (miR-193b-3p and miR-615-3p) were detected as reporter molecules. The survival analyses through Kaplan Meier curves indicated remarkable performance of reporter molecules in estimation of survival probability in CRC patients. In addition, several drug candidates including anti-neoplastic and immunomodulating agents were repositioned. Conclusions: This study presents biomarker signatures at protein and RNA levels with prognostic capability in CRC. We think that the molecular signatures and candidate drugs presented in this study might be useful in future studies indenting development of accurate diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker screens and efficient therapeutic strategies in CRC.