In
Escherichia coli
, tetracycline prevents translation. When subject to tetracycline,
E. coli
express TetA to pump it out by a mechanism that is sensitive, while fairly independent of cellular metabolism. We constructed a target gene, P
tetA
-mRFP1-96BS, with a 96 MS2-GFP binding site array in a single-copy BAC vector, whose expression is controlled by the tetA promoter. We measured the
in vivo
kinetics of production of individual RNA molecules of the target gene as a function of inducer concentration and temperature. From the distributions of intervals between transcription events, we find that RNA production by P
tetA
is a sub-Poissonian process. Next, we infer the number and duration of the prominent sequential steps in transcription initiation by maximum likelihood estimation. Under full induction and at optimal temperature, we observe three major steps. We find that the kinetics of RNA production under the control of P
tetA
, including number and duration of the steps, varies with induction strength and temperature. The results are supported by a set of logical pairwise Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. We conclude that the expression of TetA is controlled by a sequential mechanism that is robust, whereas sensitive to external signals.
BackgroundIn Escherichia coli the mean and cell-to-cell diversity in RNA numbers of different genes vary widely. This is likely due to different kinetics of transcription initiation, a complex process with multiple rate-limiting steps that affect RNA production.ResultsWe measured the in vivo kinetics of production of individual RNA molecules under the control of the lar promoter in E. coli. From the analysis of the distributions of intervals between transcription events in the regimes of weak and medium induction, we find that the process of transcription initiation of this promoter involves a sequential mechanism with two main rate-limiting steps, each lasting hundreds of seconds. Both steps become faster with increasing induction by IPTG and Arabinose.ConclusionsThe two rate-limiting steps in initiation are found to be important regulators of the dynamics of RNA production under the control of the lar promoter in the regimes of weak and medium induction. Variability in the intervals between consecutive RNA productions is much lower than if there was only one rate-limiting step with a duration following an exponential distribution. The methodology proposed here to analyze the in vivo dynamics of transcription may be applicable at a genome-wide scale and provide valuable insight into the dynamics of prokaryotic genetic networks.
We measured the in vivo production of RNA molecules tagged with MS2d-GFP in Escherichia coli, driven by the lar promoter, under weak and medium induction. The distributions of intervals between consecutive productions of RNAs are found to be sub-exponential, and the process of RNA production is found to be sub-Poissonian. We discuss possible models of transcription initiation and, based on our results and previous in vitro measurements, find that a sequential two-step model of transcription initiation at the promoter region explains well the results.
a b s t r a c tThe kinetics of transcription initiation in Escherichia coli depend on the duration of two rate-limiting steps, the closed and the open complex formation. In a lac promoter variant, P lac/ara-1 , the kinetics of these steps is controlled by IPTG and arabinose. From in vivo single-RNA measurements, we find that induction affects the mean and normalized variance of the intervals between consecutive RNA productions. Transcript production is sub-Poissonian in all conditions tested. The kinetics of each step is independently controlled by a different inducer. We conclude that the regulatory mechanism of P lac/ara-1 allows the stochasticity of gene expression to be environment-dependent.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.