INTRODUCTIONHollow viscus perforation leading to peritonitis is one of the commonest emergency surgeries conducted in a surgical practice for a case of acute abdomen.1 It is the second most common cause for acute abdomen following appendicitis. Perforation as a cause of acute abdomen accounts for 30-40% of the total cases of acute abdomen presenting to a surgical emergency.2 Among the cases of hollow viscus perforation duodenal and gastric perforations are the commonest accounting to almost 60-80 % in some series, followed by ileal, appendicular and large bowel. ABSTRACT Background:The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics in Ileal perforations because of confusion and controversy over the diagnosis and optimal surgical treatment of terminal Ileal perforationa cause of obscure peritonitis. Perforation of terminal ileum is a cause for obscure peritonitis with severe toxic state, there may be obscured clinical features with resultant delays in diagnosis and adequate surgical intervention. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in Victoria Hospital and Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital attached to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute over a period of 5 years from June 2011 to May 2015. A total of 136 patients presented in this period with hollow viscus perforation and out of these 64 patients had Ileal perforation alone on exploratory laparotomy. Ileal perforations account for about 20 percent of all cases of hollow viscus perforation. Emergency exploratory laparotomy was done and perforation was identified, edge biopsy was taken in all cases and the perforation was closed in two layers and resection anastomosis was done in stricture with perforation. Histopathological report was reviewed following surgery. Results: A total of 64 patients with Ileal perforation were included in the study of which 52 were males and 12 were females accounting for 81.25 percent and 18.75 percent respectively. The causes for perforation were enteric fever (82.81%), nonspecific inflammation (9.38%), and tuberculosis (7.81%). Simple closure of the perforation (74.58%) and the remaining primary resection and anastomosis were the mainstay of the surgical management. Conclusions: The common pathology of Ileal perforation is Typhoid or Enteric fever, Non-specific ulcer, Tuberculosis and others. Intestinal complications of typhoid fever are quite common in developing countries. Nonspecific inflammation of the terminal ileum was other predominant cause operative findings were similar to that of typhoid fever but no laboratory evidence of the disease was found. Intestinal tuberculosis can mimic many conditions.

Desmoid tumour of the anterior abdominal wall (rectus sheath) commonly occurs in women post abdominal surgery. Metastasis from colorectal cancer to the anterior abdominal wall, on the other hand, is rare and produces a complex management dilemma. This Case study presents a 57-year-old woman who received a curative laparoscopic low anterior resection and adjuvant chemoradiation in 2013. Seven years later, she presented with an asymptomatic anterior abdominal wall lump. Clinically, the lump appeared to be a desmoid tumour. A wide local excision of the lump was carried out and the final histopathology showed a metastatic lesion (adenocarcinoma). With adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient is now disease-free and doing well. A possibility of distant metastasis must be kept in mind for all patients, even when they have undergone curative resection with adjuvant chemoradiation for colorectal cancer.