Introduction There is growing evidence that exercise provides benefit in treating motor and non‐motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Objectives The aims of this study were to determine (a) whether a 5‐week PD‐specific program resulted in sustained physical and psychosocial benefits, and (b) the relationship between patient characteristics, exercise, falls and physical and psychosocial parameters. Design Single‐centre prospective observational study. Methods A total of 135 consecutive patients with mild‐to‐moderate PD underwent a 5‐week PD‐specific education and exercise program from August 2013 to March 2015. Gait, mobility and psychosocial measures were compared at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 months. Results Significant improvements in physical (walking distance in 2 minutes, number of “Sit To Stands” in 30 seconds, time in seconds taken to “Timed Up and Go,” fast gait velocity over 10 m, Berg Balance Scale [BBS]) and psychosocial (quality of life (QoL) [PDQ‐39], depression and anxiety [DASS‐21], and fatigue [PSF‐16]) measures were seen at 6 weeks (all P < .01) with physical improvements sustained at 12 months (all P < .001). The number of patients at 12 months with ≥1 fall reduced from 66% to 33%, and the number not exercising reduced from 42% to 21%. A lack of exercise correlated with ≥1 fall at 12 months (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.36‐8.39, P = .009). It was also associated with poorer balance and psychosocial parameters at 12 months (all P < .05). Conclusions Patients recruited into a 5‐week Parkinson's disease education and exercise program achieved significant 12‐month benefits in physical but not psychosocial measures. Patients with ≥1 fall post‐treatment were less likely to have been exercising at 12‐month follow‐up.

Background: Although halo gravity traction (HGT) has been used to treat children with severe spinal deformity for decades, there is a distinct lack of high-quality evidence to speak to its merits or to dictate ideal manner of implementation. In addition, no guidelines exist to drive research or assist surgeons in their practice. The aim of this study was to establish best practice guidelines (BPG) using formal techniques of consensus building among a group of experienced pediatric spinal deformity surgeons to determine ideal indications and implementation of HGT for pediatric spinal deformity. Methods: The Delphi process and nominal group technique were used to formally derive consensus among leaders in pediatric spine surgery. Initial work identified significant areas of variability in practice for which we sought to garner consensus. After review of the literature, 3 iterative surveys were administered from February through April 2018 to nationwide experts in pediatric spinal deformity. Surveys assessed anonymous opinions on ideal practices for indications, preoperative evaluation, protocols, and complications, with agreement of 80% or higher considered consensus. Final determination of consensus items and equipoise were established using the Nominal group technique in a facilitated meeting. Results: Of the 42 surgeons invited, responses were received from 32, 40, and 31 surgeons for each survey, respectively. The final meeting included 14 experts with an average 10.5 years in practice and average 88 annual spinal deformity cases. Experts reached consensus on 67 items [indications (17), goals (1), preoperative evaluations (5), protocols (36), complications (8)]; these were consolidated to create final BPG in all categories, including statements to help dictate practice such as using at least 6 to 8 pins under 4 to 8 lbs of torque, with a small, tolerable starting weight and reaching goal weight of 50% TBW in ∼2 weeks. Nine items remained items of equipoise for the purposes of guiding future research. Conclusions: We developed consensus-based BPG for the use and implementation of HGT for pediatric spinal deformity. This can serve as a measure to help drive future research as well as give new surgeons a place to begin their practice of HGT. Level of Evidence: Level V—expert opinion.

No abstract

Early onset scoliosis is a complex manifestation of a heterogenous group of disorders, often necessitating multiple medical and surgical interventions to address the spinal deformity and its accompanying comorbidities. Current literature documents decreases in the health-related quality of life of these patients; however, there is a distinct lack of published data examining the burden on their caregivers. The purpose of this study is to compare burden on caregivers of children with early onset scoliosis and those on caregivers of age-matched healthy peers. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted by querying a national registry for patients with early onset scoliosis diagnosed before 10 years old whose caregivers completed the caregiver burden (CB) and financial burden (FB) domains of the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) before their treatment. Scores were compared by etiology and planned treatment. The study identified 503 patients categorized by etiology and eventual treatment type. Overall, FB and CB scores for patients with early onset scoliosis were ≥10% worse than those of their age-matched peers, greater than the minimal clinically important difference for the EOSQ-24 (P < 0.001). Non-idiopathic patients’ scores were ≥16% worse than age-matched peers regardless of future treatment (P < 0.001), while scores for idiopathic patients were varied. Idiopathic patients who went on to be observed had similar scores to national norms, but those who were managed either non-operatively (14% worse FB, 7% worse CB; P < 0.001) or operatively (25% worse FB, 27% worse CB; P > 0.05) had caregivers who reported greater burdens compared to those of healthy peers. This study suggests burdens on caregivers of patients with early onset scoliosis of nearly all etiologies are greater than those imposed on caregivers of healthy children, even before the additional stress of treatment is imposed. Level of evidence: II.

No abstract