Computerized physician order entry has been shown to significantly improve chemotherapy safety by reducing the number of prescribing errors. Epic's Beacon Oncology Information System of computerized physician order entry and electronic medication administration was implemented in Henry Ford Health System's ambulatory oncology infusion centers on 9 November 2013. Since that time, compliance to the infusion workflow had not been assessed. The objective of this study was to optimize the current workflow and improve the compliance to this workflow in the ambulatory oncology setting. This study was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study which analyzed the composite workflow compliance rate of patient encounters from 9 to 23 November 2014. Based on this analysis, an intervention was identified and implemented in February 2015 to improve workflow compliance. The primary endpoint was to compare the composite compliance rate to the Beacon workflow before and after a pharmacy-initiated intervention. The intervention, which was education of infusion center staff, was initiated by ambulatory-based, oncology pharmacists and implemented by a multi-disciplinary team of pharmacists and nurses. The composite compliance rate was then reassessed for patient encounters from 2 to 13 March 2015 in order to analyze the effects of the determined intervention on compliance. The initial analysis in November 2014 revealed a composite compliance rate of 38%, and data analysis after the intervention revealed a statistically significant increase in the composite compliance rate to 83% ( p < 0.001). This study supports a pharmacist-initiated educational intervention can improve compliance to an ambulatory, oncology infusion workflow.
e19000 Background: Studies have reported that use of filgrastim (G) or any biosimilar result in similar stem cell yield during hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, but little is known on the effect of these biosimilars on length of hospitalization for the transplant procedure, engraftment, and long term survival of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Beginning January 2017, the Henry Ford Cancer Institute (HFCI) began utilizing tbo-filgrastim (TBO) and filgrastim-sndz (SNDZ) as part of mobilization. This study was conducted to evaluate transplant specific outcomes in HSCT patients comparing biosimilar and reference filgrastim products. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated all patients treated at HFCI who received G-CSF based mobilization for HSCT between 1/2017 and 11/2018. Patient-, mobilization- and transplant specific variables were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 113 patients underwent stem cell mobilization followed by collection and autologous HSCT. Of the 73 patients analyzed, 62% had a diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma (MM), 22% had Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). Approximately 45% of patients received TBO, 44% received G and remainder received SNDZ. The percentage of patients who proceeded to HSCT was 86%. There was no difference in adequate CD34+ yield among the three G-CSF products (P = 0.074). There was no difference in mobilization associated complications including bone pain and thrombocytopenia. Plerixafor use was similar among the groups (P = 0.55). Actual CD34+ (P = 0.31) and the number of apheresis sessions required to collect an adequate CD34+ yield (P = 0.30) were not different among the groups. No significant differences were noted in time to neutrophil (P = 0.96) or platelet engraftment (P = 0.91) and hospital length of stay (P = 0.78). We found similar rates of infection, febrile neutropenia, and mucositis among the three groups. Relapse rates were also similar among the groups. Conclusions: In our institution transplant related outcomes were similar among patients who received TBO, SNDZ, and G as part of their pre-transplant mobilization protocol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.