Background Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has been increasingly used to prevent graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), however, its impact on immune reconstitution is relatively unknown. Here we studied (1) immune reconstitution after ATG-conditioned hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), (2) determined factors influencing the reconstitution, and (3) compared it to non-ATG-conditioned HCT. Methods Immune cell subset counts were determined at 1–24 months posttransplant in 125 HCT recipients who received ATG during conditioning. The subset counts were also determined in 46 non-ATG-conditioned patients (similarly treated). Results (1) Reconstitution after ATG-conditioned HCT was fast for innate immune cells, intermediate for B cells and CD8 T cells, and very slow for CD4 T cells and invariant NKT (iNKT) cells. (2) Faster reconstitution after ATG-conditioned HCT was associated with higher number of cells of the same subset transferred with the graft in case of memory B cells, naïve CD4 T cells, naïve CD8 T cells, iNKT cells and myeloid dendritic cells; lower recipient age in case of naïve CD4 T cells and naïve CD8 T cells; cytomegalovirus recipient seropositivity in case of memory/effector T cells; absence of GVHD in case of naïve B cells; lower ATG serum levels in case of most T cell subsets including iNKT cells, and higher ATG levels in case of NK cells and B cells. (3) Compared to non-ATG-conditioned HCT, reconstitution after ATG-conditioned HCT was slower for CD4 T cells, and faster for NK cells and B cells. Conclusions ATG worsens reconstitution of CD4 T cells but improves reconstitution of NK and B cells.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major transplantation complication. The purpose of this study was to measure immune cell subsets by flow cytometry early after transplantation (before median day of GVHD onset) to identify subsets that may play a role in GVHD pathogenesis. We also measured the subsets later after transplantation to determine which subsets may be influenced by GVHD or its treatment. We studied 219 patients. We found that acute GVHD (aGVHD) was preceded by high counts of CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells. It was followed by low counts of total and naive B cells, total and cytolytic NK cells, and myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was preceded by low counts of memory B cells. In conclusion, both CD4 and CD8 T cells appear to play a role in the pathogenesis of aGVHD. Generation of B cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells may be hampered by aGVHD and/or its treatment. Memory B cells may inhibit the development of cGVHD.

No abstract

More cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells are transferred with grafts from CMV seropositive than seronegative donors. We hypothesized that seropositive recipients of grafts from seropositive donors (D+R+) have higher counts of CMV-specific T cells than seropositive recipients of grafts from seronegative donors (D-R+), and that this is clinically relevant in the setting of in vivo T cell depletion using rabbit-antihuman thymocyte globulin (ATG). We reviewed charts of 298 ATG-conditioned, seropositive recipients for CMV reactivation (pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNAemia above institutional threshold for preemptive therapy), recurrent CMV reactivation, CMV disease, and death. In 77 of these patients, we enumerated CMV-specific T cells. Median follow-up was 564 days. CMV-specific CD4+ and, to a lesser degree, CD8+ T cell counts were higher in D+R+ than D-R+ patients. D+R+ patients had lower cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation (21% versus 48%, P < .001), recurrent reactivation (4% versus 15%, P = .003), CMV disease (3% versus 13%, P = .005) and mortality (42% versus 56%, P = .006). We conclude that in the setting of in vivo T cell depletion using ATG, seropositive donors should be used for seropositive recipients. For scenarios where only seronegative donors are available, strategies to improve CMV-specific immunity (e.g., donor vaccination) should be explored.