In this phase 2 trial, selective blockade of interleukin-23 with risankizumab was associated with clinical responses superior to those associated with ustekinumab. This trial was not large enough or of long enough duration to draw conclusions about safety. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02054481 ).

Many of the molecular pathways associated with psoriasis pathogenesis are also involved in host defense mechanisms that protect against common pathogens. Candida can stimulate the production of cytokines that trigger or exacerbate psoriasis, and many systemic psoriasis treatments may put patients at increased risk for developing oral, cutaneous, and genitourinary candidiasis. Therefore, dermatologists should regularly screen patients with psoriasis for signs of Candida infection, and take steps to effectively treat these infections to prevent worsening of psoriasis symptoms. This review provides an overview of candidiasis epidemiology in patients with psoriasis, followed by a primer on the diagnosis and treatment of superficial Candida infections, with specific guidance for patients with psoriasis. Candidiasis in patients with psoriasis typically responds to topical or oral antifungal therapy. While biologic agents used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis, such as tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors, are known to increase patients’ risk of developing localized candidiasis, the overall risk of infection is low, and candidiasis can be effectively managed in most patients while receiving systemic psoriasis therapies. Thus, the development of candidiasis does not usually necessitate changes to psoriasis treatment regimens.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40257-016-0206-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

PDT using topical MAL 80 mg g(-1) and red light may offer promise for severe acne vulgaris.

Despite the absence of a significant difference between apremilast and placebo in proportion of patients achieving a PPPGA of 0/1, the presence of significant differences observed for several secondary endpoints suggests that apremilast may have a role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis.

BackgroundThe efficacy of ixekizumab, an anti‐interleukin‐17A (anti‐IL‐17A) monoclonal IgG4 antibody, was demonstrated in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients when administered via prefilled syringe (PFS).ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of two drug delivery devices on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ixekizumab as well as efficacy and safety with both devices.MethodsIn the first 12 weeks of an open‐label, phase 3 study, moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients were randomized to ixekizumab delivery via PFS or autoinjector device. Randomization was stratified by weight (<80 kg, 80–100 kg, >100 kg), injection assistance (yes/no) and injection site (arm, thigh or abdomen). Following a 160‐mg initial dose at week 0, patients received subcutaneous 80‐mg ixekizumab as a single injection every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Blood samples were collected following the initial 160‐mg dose on days 2, 4, 7, 10 and 14 for PK analysis. Primary PK parameters were maximum concentration (C max) and area under the curve (AUC 0‐tlast) where t last is the time of last sample (14 days ± 24 h). Efficacy was assessed by percent improvement on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at week 12. Adverse event reporting, vital signs and clinical laboratory data were used to evaluate safety.ResultsOf 204 randomized patients, 192 were included in the PK analysis (PFS: 94; autoinjector: 98). The PFS and autoinjector showed similar geometric mean C max (90% CI) [15.0 μg/mL (13.9–16.1) vs. 14.8 μg/mL (13.8–15.9)] and geometric mean AUC 0‐tlast (90% CI) [157 μg × day/mL (147–168) vs. 154 μg × day/mL (144–165)]. When comparing C max and AUC 0‐tlast of the autoinjector to PFS, the geometric LS mean ratios were 0.97. At week 12, mean percent PASI improvement (via modified baseline observation carried forward) was similar with the PFS (89.3%) and autoinjector (86.9%). Both devices had safety results that were consistent with the known safety profile of ixekizumab.ConclusionThe PK, efficacy and safety of ixekizumab administered subcutaneously by PFS and autoinjector were similar. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01777191 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777191