Purpose
– Critical discussion of the social conditions that shape educational thinking and practice is now embedded in accredited teacher education programmes. Beneath beliefs that critique of educational inequality is desirable, however, lie more problematic questions around critical pedagogies, ethics and power. Emotional investments can work to protect habituated ways of thinking, despite attempts to move students beyond their comfort zone. This strategic process can shift attitudes and promote intellectual and emotional growth, but can also produce defensive reactions. This paper, a self-study in relation to an incident in a tertiary education programme, examines how student feedback on content and pedagogy positions teachers and learners. The purpose of this paper is to frame and reframe ways in which learner feedback to critical approaches might be read. The argument examines, through dialogue, the potential of disruptive teaching approaches for recontextualising both learner and teacher response. Such exploration articulates particular tensions and challenges inherent in critical teacher education pedagogies.
Design/methodology/approach
– This is a reflective practitioner piece – involving journaling and the use of dialogue – to explore a critical incident.
Findings
– This is an exploratory piece – the authors explore the workings of tension in critical/poststructural pedagogical work.
Originality/value
– The deployment of dialogue as a method and as a way of presenting key issues is somewhat novel. The paper works through quite complex terrain in an accessible and reasonably clear fashion.
Thanks to all who gave their time to be on the reference group -they are listed below.Thanks to Anya Latham for transcription and for proofing the text.Thanks to the youth workers who supported this project and facilitated contact with young people. I'd particularly like to acknowledge and thank the 10 young people who shared their stories. I'd like to thank RMIT for providing funding through an 'Emerging Researcher Grant' as this has meant that this project has been able to happen and that the 'Workbook' has been able to be published.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.