IntroductionMultimorbidity is a major concern in primary care. Nevertheless, evidence of prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity, and their determinants, are scarce. The aim of this study is to systematically review studies of the prevalence, patterns and determinants of multimorbidity in primary care.MethodsSystematic review of literature published between 1961 and 2013 and indexed in Ovid (CINAHL, PsychINFO, Medline and Embase) and Web of Knowledge. Studies were selected according to eligibility criteria of addressing prevalence, determinants, and patterns of multimorbidity and using a pretested proforma in primary care. The quality and risk of bias were assessed using STROBE criteria. Two researchers assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion (Kappa  = 0.86).ResultsWe identified 39 eligible publications describing studies that included a total of 70,057,611 patients in 12 countries. The number of health conditions analysed per study ranged from 5 to 335, with multimorbidity prevalence ranging from 12.9% to 95.1%. All studies observed a significant positive association between multimorbidity and age (odds ratio [OR], 1.26 to 227.46), and lower socioeconomic status (OR, 1.20 to 1.91). Positive associations with female gender and mental disorders were also observed. The most frequent patterns of multimorbidity included osteoarthritis together with cardiovascular and/or metabolic conditions.ConclusionsWell-established determinants of multimorbidity include age, lower socioeconomic status and gender. The most prevalent conditions shape the patterns of multimorbidity. However, the limitations of the current evidence base means that further and better designed studies are needed to inform policy, research and clinical practice, with the goal of improving health-related quality of life for patients with multimorbidity. Standardization of the definition and assessment of multimorbidity is essential in order to better understand this phenomenon, and is a necessary immediate step.

Epidemiological studies assessing general and abdominal obesity measures or their combination for mortality prediction have shown inconsistent results. We aimed to systematically review the associations of body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) with all-cause mortality in prospective cohort studies. In this systematic review, which includes a meta-regression analysis, we analysed the associations with all-cause mortality of BMI, WHR, WC and WHtR in prospective cohort studies available in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Esbiobase from inception through 7 May 2010. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 689, 465 participants and 48, 421 deaths during 5-24 years of follow-up. The studies were heterogeneous, mainly due to differences in categorization of anthropometric parameters (AP) and different approaches to statistical analysis. Both general and abdominal obesity measures were significantly associated with mortality. In analyses using categorical variables, BMI and WC showed predominantly U- or J-shaped associations with mortality, whereas WHR and WHtR demonstrated positive relationships with mortality. All measures showed similar risk patterns for upper quantiles in comparison to reference quantiles. The parameters of general and abdominal obesity each remained significantly associated with mortality when adjusted for the other. This evidence suggests that abdominal obesity measures such as WC or WHR, show information independent to measures of general obesity and should be used in clinical practice, in addition to BMI, to assess obesity-related mortality in adults.

Background and Purpose-Previous studies have shown that midlife systolic blood pressure (SBP) predicts late-life cognitive decline and incident dementia. This study explores whether this association is attributable to the pulsatile, ie, pulse pressure (PP), or the nonpulsatile component of blood pressure (BP). Methods-Data are from the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study, a community-based study of Japanese American men. Midlife BP was measured in 1971 to 1974 and dementia assessment was conducted in late-life. The 2505 men who were dementia free in 1991 and had complete follow-up data were re-examined for incident dementia in 1994 to 1996 and 1997 to 1999. Their age ranged from 71 to 93 years. Survival analysis with age as the time scale was performed to estimate the risk (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% CI) for incident dementia associated with mid-and late-life tertiles of PP and mean arterial BP, as well as SBP and diastolic BP categories. Results-Over a mean of 5.1 years of follow-up, 189 cases (7.5%) of incident Alzheimer disease or vascular dementia were identified. After adjustment for cerebrovascular risk factors, dementia was significantly associated with SBP (HR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.84, for SBP Ն140 mm Hg compared with SBP Ͻ120 mm Hg), but not with PP tertiles. Limiting the analysis to those never treated with antihypertensives, high levels of all 4 BP components were significantly associated with dementia. In models with 2 BP components, only SBP remained significant in both the total sample and the never-treated subgroup (HR 2.29; 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.25, for SBP Ն140 mm Hg in total sample), whereas PP was not significantly associated with the risk for dementia. Conclusions-Midlife PP is not independently associated with dementia incidence. Midlife SBP is the strongest BP component predicting incident dementia. (Stroke. 2006;37:33-37.)