Zusammenfassung Ziel der Studie Die starre Trennung von ambulanter und stationärer Versorgung im deutschen Gesundheitssystem verhindert eine Behandlungskontinuität, obwohl sie sich für psychiatrische Patienten als sehr wichtig erwiesen hat. Die vorliegende Studie analysiert die Behandlungskontinuität einer Modellklinik mit einem Gesamtbudget nach § 64b SGB V und konstantem Behandlungspersonal über alle Settings hinweg im Vergleich zu einer Kontrollklinik mit Regelfinanzierung ohne ein solches Team. Methodik In einer prospektiven Kohortenstudie mit einem Beobachtungszeitraum von 20 Monaten wurden Daten zur Behandlungskontinuität von 220 Patienten der Modellklinik und 215 Patienten der Kontrollklinik erhoben. Ergebnisse Die Modellklinik erreichte eine signifikant höhere Behandlungskontinuität als die Kontrollklinik, sowohl während der stationären Behandlung zum Zeitpunkt der Rekrutierung als auch in allen Settings während des Beobachtungszeitraums. Schlussfolgerung Ein Gesamtbudget kann die notwendigen Voraussetzungen für eine flexiblere psychiatrische Versorgung und eine bessere Umsetzung der Behandlungskontinuität schaffen.

Background Continuity of care is considered an important treatment aspect of psychiatric disorders, as it often involves long-lasting or recurrent episodes with psychosocial treatment aspects. We investigated in two psychiatric hospitals in Germany whether the positive effects of relational continuity of care on symptom severity, social functioning, and quality of life, which have been demonstrated in different countries, can also be achieved in German psychiatric care. Methods Prospective cohort study with a 20-months observation period comparing 158 patients with higher and 165 Patients with lower degree of continuity of care of two psychiatric hospitals. Patients were surveyed at three points in time (10 and 20 months after baseline) using validated questionnaires (CGI Clinical Global Impression rating scales, GAF Global Assessment of Functioning scale, EQ-VAS Euro Quality of Life) and patient clinical record data. Statistical analyses with analyses of variance with repeated measurements of 162 patients for the association between the patient- (EQ-VAS) or observer-rated (CGI, GAF) outcome measures and continuity of care as between-subject factor controlling for age, sex, migration background, main psychiatric diagnosis group, duration of disease, and hospital as independent variables. Results Higher continuity of care reduced significantly the symptom severity with a medium effect size (p 0.036, eta 0.064) and increased significantly social functioning with a medium effect size (p 0.023, eta 0.076) and quality of life but not significantly and with only a small effect size (p 0.092, eta 0.022). The analyses of variance suggest a time-independent effect of continuity of care. The duration of psychiatric disease, a migration background, and the hospital affected the outcome measures independent of continuity of care. Conclusion Our results support continuity of care as a favorable clinical aspect in psychiatric patient treatment and encourage mental health care services to consider health service delivery structures that increase continuity of care in the psychiatric patient treatment course. In psychiatric health care services research patients’ motives as well as methodological reasons for non-participation remain considerable potential sources for bias. Trial registration This prospective cohort study was not registered as a clinical intervention study because no intervention was part of the study, neither on the patient level nor the system level.

ObjectivesPatients in German ambulatory care frequently report patient safety problems (PSP). It is unclear whether patients report PSP back to their general practitioner (GP) or specialist in charge. This study reports on how patients respond to experienced PSP.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.SettingComputer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) with randomly recruited citizens aged ≥40 years in Germany.Participants10 037 citizens ≥40 years. About 52% of the interviewees were female, 38% were between 60 and 79 years old and about 47% reported that they were chronically ill. A total of 2589 PSPs was reported.Primary and secondary measures/ResultsAccording to the respondents (n=1422, 77%, 95% CI: 74.7 to 79.1), 72% (95% CI: 70.2 to 73.7) of PSP were reported back to the GP in charge or to another GP/specialist. Further reactions were taken by 65% (95% CI: 62.5 to 67.5) of the interviewees: around 63% (95% CI: 62.5 to 66.2) of the reported PSP led to a loss of faith in the physician or to complaints. χ2 and binary logistic regression analyses show significant associations between the (a) reporting and (b) reaction behaviour and determinants like ‘medical treatment area’ ((a) χ2=17.13, p=0.009/(b) χ2=97.58, p=0.000), ‘PSP with/without harm’ ((a) χ2=111.84, p=0.000/(b) χ2=265.39, p=0.000) and sociodemographic characteristics when respondents are aged between 40 and 59 years ((a) OR 2.57/(b) OR 2.60) or have chronic illnesses ((a) OR 2.16/(b) OR 2.14).ConclusionThe data suggest that PSPs are frequently reported back to the GP or specialist in charge and have a significant serious impact on the physician–patient relationship. Much could be learnt from the patient reporting and reacting behaviour to prevent PSPs in ambulatory care.