MDCT quantification of total and emphysematous lung volume and emphysema index is overall reproducible. Quantitative assessment of those parameters performed on single lobes is affected by variability. An improvement of the reproducibility of q-MDCT is expected from the use of advanced methods for lobar segmentation.
Non-small-cell lung cancer first-pass perfusion performed with 64-detector-row CT showed good repeatability and high intra- and interobserver agreement for all perfusion parameters and may be considered a reliable and robust tool for assessing tumour vascularisation.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE PURPOSE We aimed to compare the intra-and interoperator variability of lobar volumetry and emphysema scores obtained by semi-automated and manual segmentation techniques in lung emphysema patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODSIn two sessions held three months apart, two operators performed lobar volumetry of unenhanced chest computed tomography examinations of 47 consecutive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung emphysema. Both operators used the manual and semi-automated segmentation techniques. The intra-and interoperator variability of the volumes and emphysema scores obtained by semi-automated segmentation was compared with the variability obtained by manual segmentation of the five pulmonary lobes.
RESULTSThe intra-and interoperator variability of the lobar volumes decreased when using semi-automated lobe segmentation 166.9 vs. 68.7; and left lower lobe, 168.7 vs. 71.6). The coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility of emphysema scores also decreased when using semi-automated segmentation and had ranges that varied depending on the target lobe and selected threshold of emphysema. CONCLUSION Semi-automated segmentation reduces the intra-and interoperator variability of lobar volumetry and provides a more objective tool than manual technique for quantifying lung volumes and severity of emphysema.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.