Background: Glioblastoma multiforme is a CNS cancer characterized by diffuse infiltrative growth, aggressive clinical behavior and very poor prognosis. The state-of-art clinical approach to this disease consists of surgical resection followed by radiotherapy plus concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. Tumor recurrence occurs in virtually all cases, therefore, despite any treatment, the median survival is very low (14.6 months), which makes the approach to these patients a challenging clinical issue. Main body: The escalating costs and times required for new medications to reach the bedside make repurposing or repositioning of old drugs, when scientific bases allow their use in other pathologies, an appealing strategy.Here, we analyze a number of literature data concerning the antipsychotic chlorpromazine, the founder of the phenothiazines class of drugs, a medication widely used in the clinics for approximately 60 years. The drug exerts its effects on psychiatric patients by interfering with the dopamine receptor D 2 , although more recent pharmacodynamics studies ascribe chlorpromazine a series of biological effects on cancer cells, all converging in hindering also glioblastoma survival capabilities.Short conclusions: On these bases, and assisted by the information on the well-established chlorpromazine toxicity and dosage in humans, we designed a Phase II clinical trial involving the combination of chlorpromazine with the standard treatment, temozolomide, in the adjuvant phase of the therapeutic protocol. Patients displaying hypo-methylation of the MGMT gene, and thus intrinsically resistant to temozolomide, will be enrolled. The endpoints of this study are the analysis of toxicity and clinical activity, as evaluated in terms of Progression-Free Survival, of the association of chlorpromazine with the first-line treatment for this very serious form of cancer.

The small molecule SI113 is an inhibitor of the kinase activity of SGK1, a key biological regulator acting on the PI3K/mTOR signal transduction pathway. Several studies demonstrate that this compound is able to strongly restrain cancer growth in vitro and in vivo, alone or in associative antineoplastic treatments, being able to elicit an autophagic response, either cytotoxic or cytoprotective. To elucidate more exhaustively the molecular mechanisms targeted by SI113, we performed activitybased protein profiling (ABPP) proteomic analysis using a kinase enrichment procedure. This technique allowed the identification via mass spectrometry of novel targets of this compound, most of them involved in functions concerning cell motility and cytoskeletal architecture. Using a glioblastoma multiforme, hepatocarcinoma and colorectal carcinoma cell line, we recognized an inhibitory effect of SI113 on cell migration, invading, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In addition, these cancer cells, when exposed to this compound, showed a remarkable subversion of the cytoskeletal architecture characterized by F-actin destabilization, phospho-FAK delocalization, and tubulin depolimerization. These results were definitely concordant in attributing to SI113 a key role in hindering cancer cell malignancy and, due to its negligible in vivo toxicity, can sustain performing a Phase I clinical trial to employ this drug in associative cancer therapy. K E Y W O R D Sactivity-based protein profiling (ABPP), cytoskeleton, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, kinase inhibitors, SI113

Glioblastoma (GBM) is associated with a very dismal prognosis, and current therapeutic options still retain an overall unsatisfactorily efficacy in clinical practice. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches and effective medications are highly needed. Since the development of new drugs is an extremely long, complex and expensive process, researchers and clinicians are increasingly considering drug repositioning/repurposing as a valid alternative to the standard research process. Drug repurposing is also under active investigation in GBM therapy, since a wide range of noncancer and cancer therapeutics have been proposed or investigated in clinical trials. Among these, a remarkable role is played by the antipsychotic drugs, thanks to some still partially unexplored, interesting features of these agents. Indeed, antipsychotic drugs have been described to interfere at variable incisiveness with most hallmarks of cancer. In this review, we analyze the effects of antipsychotics in oncology and how these drugs can interfere with the hallmarks of cancer in GBM. Overall, according to available evidence, mostly at the preclinical level, it is possible to speculate that repurposing of antipsychotics in GBM therapy might contribute to providing potentially effective and inexpensive therapies for patients with this disease.

No abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM, grade IV astrocytoma), the most frequently occurring primary brain tumor, presents unique challenges to therapy due to its location, aggressive biological behavior, and diffuse infiltrative growth, thus contributing to having disproportionately high morbidity and mortality [...]