Introduction
Corynebacterium ulcerans
can produce diphtheria toxin and although still rare, is now the predominant cause of toxigenic diphtheria infection in the UK, making this organism of great clinical and public health importance. Here we describe a cutaneous case, likely secondary to domestic animal contact.
Case presentation
A 60-year-old female presented with a slow-healing finger-burn wound. A skin swab cultured
Corynebacterium ulcerans,
which was confirmed to be toxin producing. She resided with her partner and two dogs, one of which had a chronic skin lesion. Her most recent diphtheria vaccine was in 2009. Four close contacts were identified, two of whom were healthcare professionals, and nose and throat swabs were obtained. The patient was treated with clarithromycin (14 day course), diphtheria vaccine and excluded from work until completion of antibiotics and negative clearance swabs. Contacts were given erythromycin (7 day course), vaccinated and healthcare worker contacts excluded from work until swab negative. A veterinary practitioner swabbed the throats and a skin lesion of their dogs. One contact (partner of patient) and all dog swabs were positive. Partial allelic profiles from MLST supported an epidemiological link. The dogs were treated with antibiotics and antimicrobial skin wash. Repeat swabs for the index case, contact and both dogs were negative following treatment.
Conclusion
This was a rare case of cutaneous diphtheria secondary to
Corynebacterium ulcerans
with domestic animals the most likely source, although human-to-human contact could not be excluded, with important human and animal public health implications.
Background The aim of this study is to monitor the trend in antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Nanjing, China. Gonococcal strains isolated during 2015-2018 were examined for susceptibility to seven antibiotics and compared with results from 2013-14 (Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2018) Methods 1173 gonococcal strains were isolated from men with urethritis; n=789 (2015-18), compared with n=384 . MICs for seven antibiotics were determined by agar dilution method. Criteria for decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone (MIC!0.125 mg/L) and cefixime (MIC!0.25 mg/ L) were defined by WHO. Using CLSI and EUCAST (for azithromycin only) criteria, the following MIC breakpoints were used to ascertain resistance: !128 mg/L, spectinomycin; !2 mg/L, penicillin and tetracycline and !1 mg/L, ciprofloxacin and azithromycin. Resistance determinants were investigated using WGS of two isolates which were resistant to both ceftriaxone and cefixime. Results The percentage of isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone rose from 9.9% in 2013-14 to 23% in 2016 and decreased to 16.7% in 2018 (P=0.01). The percentage of isolates with decreased susceptibility to cefixime rose from 0.3% (2013-14) to 15.7% in 2016 and decreased to 13.7% in 2018 (P<0.0001). 38 isolates displalyed MIC!0.5 mg/L for cefixime, among them 26.3%(10) belonged to ST5308 and one isolate to ST1407 NG-MAST types. Two isolates that exhibited MIC=1 mg/L for ceftriaxone and MIC=2 mg/L for cefixime were detected in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Each possessed mosaic penA-60.001 gene (the same as FC428 isolated in Japan). Azithromycin resistance decreased from 32.3% (2013-14) to 15.2% ( 2018) and high-level azithromycin resistance (MIC !256 mg/L) decreased from 10.4% (2013-14) to 3.4% (2018) (P<0.001). All 1173 isolates were susceptible to spectinomycin, but resistant to ciprofloxacin. 81.3% isolates were resistant to penicillin and 84.8% to tetracycline. Conclusion The proportion of N. gonorrhoeae isolates with decreased susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins increased significantly from 2013 to 2018. Ceftriaxone-resistant strain has emerged in Nanjing, China. Disclosure No significant relationships.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.