No abstract

Bioethanol has attracted attention as an alternative to petroleum-derived fuel. Seaweeds have been proposed as some of the most promising raw materials for bioethanol production because they have several advantages over lignocellulosic biomass. However, because seaweeds contain low contents of glucans, i.e., polysaccharides composed of glucose, the conversion of only the glucans from seaweed is not sufficient to produce high concentrations of ethanol. Therefore, it is also necessary to produce ethanol from other specific carbohydrate components of seaweeds, including sulfated polysaccharides, mannitol, alginate, agar and carrageenan. This review summarizes the current state of research on the production of ethanol from seaweed carbohydrates for which the conversion of carbohydrates to sugars is a key step and makes comparisons with the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. This review provides valuable information necessary for the production of high concentrations of ethanol from seaweeds.

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), shows superior efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations (EGFR Mut+). However, almost all tumors eventually develop resistance to erlotinib. Recently, the Phase II JO25567 study reported significant prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) by erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination compared with erlotinib in EGFR Mut+ NSCLC. Herein, we established a preclinical model which became refractory to erlotinib after long-term administration and elucidated the mode of action of this combination. In this model, tumor regrowth occurred after remarkable shrinkage by erlotinib; regrowth was successfully inhibited by erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Tumor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was greatly reduced by erlotinib in the erlotinib-sensitive phase but significantly increased in the erlotinib-refractory phase despite continued treatment with erlotinib. Although EGFR phosphorylation remained suppressed in the erlotinib-refractory phase, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK), phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) were markedly higher than in the erlotinib-sensitive phase; among these, pERK was suppressed by erlotinib plus bevacizumab. MVD was decreased significantly more with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with each drug alone. In conclusion, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination demonstrated promising efficacy in the B901L xenograft model of EGFR Mut+ NSCLC. Re-induction of VEGF and subsequent direct or indirect VEGF-dependent tumor growth was suggested as a major mechanism of erlotinib resistance, and erlotinib plus bevacizumab achieved remarkably prolonged antitumor activity in this model.

It has been reported that bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel significantly prolongs progression-free survival compared with paclitaxel alone in the initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer. To understand how bevacizumab enhances the efficacy of paclitaxel, we investigated the mechanism in a MX-1 human breast cancer xenograft model. The antitumor activity of bevacizumab at 5 mg/kg in combination with paclitaxel at 20 or 30 mg/kg was significantly higher than that of either agent alone. First, we measured the paclitaxel concentration in tumor to see whether bevacizumab enhances the activity by increasing the tumor concentration of paclitaxel. When given in combination with bevacizumab, the levels of paclitaxel in the tumor increased. Paclitaxel at 30 mg/kg with bevacizumab showed a similar tumor concentration as paclitaxel alone at either 60 or 100 mg/kg, with a similar degree of tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, no remarkable differences in paclitaxel concentration in the plasma or liver were observed between the paclitaxel monotherapy group and the paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group. An increase in paclitaxel concentration by bevacizumab was also found in another model, A549. In the same MX-1 model, vascular permeability in the tumor was significantly decreased by treatment with bevacizumab. There was no difference in microvessel density between the bevacizumab alone group and the combination group. Results suggest that the synergistic antitumor activity of paclitaxel and bevacizumab in combination may be a result of the increase in paclitaxel concentration in tumor resulting from the downregulation of vascular permeability when co-administered with bevacizumab.