In the pre-Brexit era, England has established itself as one of the dominant jurisdictions for the resolution of cross-border disputes in the European Union (and the world). The legal regime in relation to private international law (PIL) in England and Wales has been significantly influenced by the EU PIL framework that was adopted at EU level. The United Kingdom decision to leave the EU might have significant implications for the parties’ access to justice in cross-border cases. This paper aims to devise a theoretical framework that is necessary to evaluate the potential impact of the UK’s decision to leave the EU on the private parties’ access to legal remedies. To this end, the author relies on empirical (qualitative) data that was gathered in 2015 and early 2016 in the context of the EU Private International Law: Legal Application in Reality (‘EUPILLAR’) project, indicating how the current EU PIL framework is functioning in England and Wales. An analysis of the way the parties’ strategies are devised under the current EU PIL regime helps in identifying the aspects which need to be considered, in order to set the research agenda and ascertain how the legal landscape in relation to PIL should be revised in the post-Brexit era.

The international commercial arbitration modules that are increasingly taught at postgraduate level at British universities seem to be quite popular among students who have not obtained their first law degrees in the UK. Whilst the seminars, which require a great deal of independent study, may be a valid mode for teaching postgraduate students who have graduated in the UK, the same may not be true for teaching postgraduate students who have obtained their first degrees abroad. The aim of the article is to identify the teaching methods that should be used, in order to foster seminar discussions and encourage the postgraduate students who have not obtained their first degrees in Britain to understand the relevant material by reading widely. The project involved the use of a number of teaching techniques by the author for a trial period (i.e., an academic year).The study clearly showed that if we want to promote a "deep approach" to learning when teaching international commercial arbitration, then we need to adopt a mix of teaching methods that considers the individual interests, needs and abilities of each individual student.

No abstract

Abstract:The authors have aimed to produce a theoretical model which considers the choice of governance design of cross-border EU competition law actions. To this end, they have analysed the current litigation pattern (and litigants' strategies). On this basis, the specific issues which arise in cross-border EU competition law actions have been identified with a view to proposing an appropriate course for any reform in the area. A mix of research methods have been used -in addition to employing traditional library based legal research methods, opinions of legal practitioners from England and Germany and policy-makers from Brussels have been considered. The article demonstrates that, given the diverse nature of the European Union, a new mode of governance should be used by the EU legislator in order to close the EU competition law enforcement gap. The authors suggest that Regulation 1/2003 should incorporate a specifically designated private international law mechanism which promotes inter-jurisdictional regulatory competition in the area of EU competition law dispute resolution, and produces efficient enforcement results in a multi-level system of governance. It has been submitted that some of the specific problems that arise may be best addressed by appropriately drafted private international rules which address inter alia the low mobility of consumers and SMEs.

No abstract