2010
DOI: 10.5235/174410410792166520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Brussels I Regulation: Cross-Border Collective Redress Proceedings and Judgments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 Although Article 4 BRIbis is the cornerstone of the Brussels regime and hence, an impeccable alternative from the private international law perspective, it is not always accessible for all claimants. 60 It has been argued that the gathering of claims creates important synergies that give victims and their representatives enough power to start litigation in the domicile of the defendant. 61 Nevertheless, some important barriers towards cross-border litigation remain.…”
Section: Application Of the Brussels Rules On Jurisdictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Although Article 4 BRIbis is the cornerstone of the Brussels regime and hence, an impeccable alternative from the private international law perspective, it is not always accessible for all claimants. 60 It has been argued that the gathering of claims creates important synergies that give victims and their representatives enough power to start litigation in the domicile of the defendant. 61 Nevertheless, some important barriers towards cross-border litigation remain.…”
Section: Application Of the Brussels Rules On Jurisdictionmentioning
confidence: 99%