A 67‐year‐old female was hospitalized due to right‐sided hemiparesis and neck pain with rapid deterioration to a deep coma. She had received the Sinopharm vaccine 2 days earlier. MRI showed extensive cervicothoracic hematomyelia. She received intensive medical care for 2 months and was discharged. An 18‐month follow‐up showed significant neurological recovery.
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and safety of two different techniques for spinal ligamentotaxis. Spine ligamentotaxis reduces the number of retropulsed bone fragments in the fractured vertebrae. Two different ligamentotaxis techniques require clinical evaluation.
Methods
This was a randomized clinical trial. The case group was defined as one pedicular screw insertion into a fractured vertebra, and the control group as a no-pedicular screw in the index vertebra. Spine biomechanical values were defined as primary outcomes and complications as secondary outcomes.
Results
A total of 105 patients were enrolled; 23 were excluded for multiple reasons, and the remaining were randomly allocated into the case (n=40) and control (n=42) groups. The patients were followed up and analyzed (n=56). The postoperative mid-sagittal diameter of the vertebral canal (MSD), kyphotic deformity correction, and restoration of the anterior height of the fractured vertebrae showed equal results in both groups. Postoperative retropulsion percentage and pain were significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (
p
=0.003 and
p
=0.004, respectively). There were no group preferences for early or long-term postoperative complications.
Conclusions
Regarding clinical and imaging properties, inserting one extra pedicular screw in a fractured vertebra during ligamentotaxis results in better retropulsion reduction and lower postoperative pain.
AimPatients with chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) are at a significant risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Surgeons should weigh the advantages versus disadvantages of anticoagulants in the postoperative period.Patients and MethodsThis study was a randomized clinical trial conducted in Isfahan, Iran, from May 2016 to April 2021. Patients with CSDH eligible for bur‐hole craniostomy were primarily enrolled. All of them underwent bilateral lower limb Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) screening. The patients were randomized into the case (n = 66, enoxaparin initiation 24 h after operation) and control (n = 70, enoxaparin initiation 72 h after operation) groups. Routine postoperative brain computed tomography scans were obtained 1 and 3 days after surgery. A second DUS was performed 96 h after operation to screen newly developed venous thrombosis; P value <.05 was defined significant.ResultsA total of 73 patients (59.8%) were female and 49 (40.2%) were male. The mean age was 65.1 ± 10.19 years; 9.9% of the patients had previously used antiplatelets. One patient had asymptomatic preoperative DVT. The mean values for enoxaparin dosage were 40.4918 ± 5.43 mg/day. Postoperative DVT or rebleeding prevalence was 0% in both groups. The mean follow‐up duration was 19.139 ± 2.2 months. Long‐term recurrence rate was 2.4% (n = 3). Postoperative pneumocephalus was associated with a higher recurrence rate (P = .031).ConclusionIn terms of VTE chemoprophylaxis, following bur‐hole craniostomy for CSDH, enoxaparin will effectively prevent VTE development without any clinically significant rebleeding.
A 6‐year‐old girl with persistent headaches and the visual problem was diagnosed as a delayed onset cranial pansynostosis with concurrent type 1.5 Arnold‐Chiari malformation. She underwent multi‐sutural reconstructive surgery and followed. The headache was greatly decreased and tonsillar‐brain stem herniation and syrinx were resolved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.