BackgroundThe effectiveness of Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has been demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness on mTNBC from the Chinese and United States (US) perspective.MethodsA partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of SG versus single-agent chemotherapy based on clinical data from the ASCENT phase 3 randomized trial. Cost and utility data were obtained from the literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured, and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to observe model stability. A Markov model was constructed to validate the results.ResultsIn China, SG yielded an additional 0.35 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at an additional cost of Chinese Renminbi ¥2257842. The ICER was ¥6375856 ($924037)/QALY. In the US, SG yielded the same additional QALY at an extra cost of $175393 and the ICER was $494479/QALY. Similar results were obtained from the Markov model. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that SG price had the greatest impact on the ICER. PSA showed the probability of SG to be cost-effective when compared with chemotherapy was zero at the current willing-to-pay threshold of ¥217341/QALY and $150000/QALY in China and the US, respectively. The probability of cost-effectiveness of SG would approximate 50% if its price was reduced to ¥10.44/mg in China and $3.65/mg in the US.ConclusionSG is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment of mTNBC at the current price both in China and the US.

The present study aimed to compare the thickness of brain abscesses in the deep and the superficial brain and to investigate the factors that influence the capsule of brain abscesses. The thickness of the brain abscess wall was evaluated on imaging. Bacteriological examination was performed on the abscess pus and wall, and immunohistochemical staining was used to count the number of macrophages. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze overall survival. The results indicated that the wall of deep-brain abscesses was thicker than that of superficial abscesses. There was a difference in the extent of macrophage infiltration of deep-and superficial-brain abscess walls, and differences in the extent of macrophage infiltration in the wall of brain abscesses caused by various microorganisms were statistically significant. Of note, among the brain abscesses caused by Staphylococcus, the extent of macrophage/microglia infiltration and the thickness of the wall of the deep-brain abscesses were greater than those of superficial-brain abscesses and there was a positive correlation between the number of macrophages and the thickness of the abscess wall. The overall survival (OS) of patients with deep-brain abscess was not significantly shorter than that of patients with superficial-brain abscess. Furthermore, OS was not significantly different among groups of patients receiving different types of treatment. In conclusion, the wall of deep-brain abscesses is thicker than that of superficial abscesses and the infiltration of macrophages is abundant. The thick wall of abscesses in the deep brain may be associated with macrophage infiltration.

BackgroundGiant serpentine aneurysms (GSAs) are among the most complex and challenging type of intracranial aneurysms. Surgical clipping, bypass, or endovascular parent artery occlusion has been the main treatment of GSAs in the past. However, studies on flow diversion (FD) are limited. Therefore, we reported our experience with patients with GSAs treated with FD.MethodsPatients with GSAs treated with FD from 2012 to 2020 in our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Angiographic outcomes were graded according to the O’Kelly–Marotta scale as complete occlusion (D), trace filling (C), entry remnant (B), or aneurysm filling (A). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. We also collected the patients’ treatment details and perioperative complications.ResultsThirteen patients with 14 aneurysms were included, including three in the anterior circulation and 11 in the posterior circulation. Grades B–D were found in 72.7% (8/11) of the GSAs. Good prognosis (mRS score, 0–2) was found in 66.7% (8/12) and 50.0% (6/12) of the patients at the 6-month and latest follow-up, respectively. Parent artery occlusion was found in three cases of GSAs. Five postoperative complications were observed, including two minor complications and three major complications.ConclusionAlthough reconstructive treatment with FD could be considered as one of the treatment strategies for patients with both anterior and posterior circulation GSAs, however, the risk of complications and parent artery occlusion should be considered.