No abstract

A temperature-sensitive matrine-imprinted polymer was prepared in chloroform by free-radical cross-linking copolymerization of methacrylic acid at 60 °C in the presence of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as the cross-linker, N-isopropyl acrylamide as the temperature-responsive monomer and matrine as the template molecule. Binding experiments and Scatchard analyses revealed that two classes of binding sites were formed on molecular imprinted polymer (MIP) at 50 °C. Additionally, the thermoresponsive MIP was tested for its application as a sorbent material for the selective separation of matrine from Chinese medicinal plant radix Sophorae tonkinensis. It was shown that the thermoresponsive MIP displayed different efficiency in clean-up and enrichments using the SPE protocol at different temperatures.

A rapid, sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method (HPLC-MS) was developed and validated to determine the 14-(3-methylbenzyl)matrine (3MBM) and 14-(4-methylbenzyl)matrine (4MBM) levels in rat plasma in the present study. The analytes were separated using a C18 column (1.9 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) equipped with a Security Guard C18 column (5 μm, 2.1 mm × 10 mm), followed by detection via triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Sample pretreatment involved one-step protein precipitation with isopropanol:ethyl acetate (v/v, 25:75), and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride was used as an internal standard. The method was linear in the concentration range of 5–2000 ng/ml for both compounds. The intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) were less than 15%, and all relative errors (REs) were within 15%. The proposed method enables the unambiguous identification and quantification of these two compounds in vivo. This study is the first to determine the 3MBM and 4MBM levels in rat plasma after oral administration of these compounds. These results provide a meaningful basis for evaluating the clinical applications of these medicines.

The researcher will introduce the way of effective liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric method (HPLC-MS) which is quick, sensitive, and alternative to determine the (E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) -2-(3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acrylamido)propanoic acid (A1) and rosmarinic acid (RA) of the plasma in rats. The analyses were divided into a C18 column (1.9 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) with a security guard C18 column (5 μm, 2.1 mm × 10 mm) and a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry with an electrospray ionization (ESI) ion-source generates ions. With Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride being a standard, the sample pretreatment is relevant to the one-step protein precipitation with isopropanol: ethyl acetate (v/v, 20:80). This method presented a linear relationship within ranges of the concentration of 5–750 ng/ml for RA and A1. Relative standard deviations (RSD) in daily courses stood less than 15% and the relative errors (RE) registered within 15%. The means adopted in this research makes the RA’s and A1’s unambiguous quantification and identification and in vivo possible. And this study can be the first one to focus on determining the A1 and RA of rat plasma with administration orally. The results served as a significant basis to evaluate the medicine’s applications in the clinic.

The anticancer effects of rosmarinic acid (RA) are a hotspot of current research. In order to enhance its pharmacological activity, N-substituted RA was prepared, and it has been shown to exhibit notable antitumor effects. In order to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic analysis is necessary. In the present study, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method, was used to determine the concentrations of RA and its analog, (E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-(3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acrylamido)propanoic acid (A2) in plasma from rats. The analyses were divided into a C18 column (1.9 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) with a security guard C18 column (5 μm, 2.1 mm × 10 mm) and a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry with an electrospray ionization ion-source generates ions. The sample pretreatment is relevant to the one-step protein precipitation with isopropanol:ethyl acetate (v/v, 1:1) This method presented a linear association within ranges at the concentration of 5–2000 ng/mL for A2 and RA. Relative standard deviations in daily courses were <15% and the relative errors registered within 15%. The methods used in the present study make the unambiguous quantification and identification of RA and A2 possible in vivo. The present study is the first to focus on determining A2 and RA in rat plasma following oral administration. The results may provide a meaningful basis for the evaluation of the application of RA and its analog in clinical practice and also provide a reference method for the pharmacokinetic analysis of RA analogs.