Dr Milan Škulić, redovni profesor Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu1, napisao je priručnik “Osnovne novine u krivičnom procesnompravu Srbije, novi Zakonik o krivičnom postupku iz 2011. godine”,u izdanju Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. Recenzenti su dr VojislavĐurđić, redovni profesor Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, dr Stanko Bejatović, redovni profesor Pravnog fakulteta u Kragujevcu i dr DaniloNikolić, advokat iz Niša.

Organized crime is a serious form of crime, whether it is viewed in the criminological sense or as the criminal justice response to this phenomenon. In this regard, the penal policy of the legislator should be proportionate to the gravity of organized crime. However, the penal policy of the courts does not reflect the stated intentions, which is primarily reflected in relatively mild criminal penalties for criminal offenses of organized crime. Although the case law does not contravene the law, i.e. contra legem, because it moves within the boundaries prescribed by the law, it is obvious that the issue is about imbalance of punishment for these criminal offenses, even when it comes to mitigating of the sentence of imprisonment. This paper will provide an analysis of the criminal law framework of organized crime prescribed by the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC BiH), as well as an analysis (statistical and descriptive) of the jurisprudence in the criminal cases of organized crime before the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Court of BiH) for the period 2015-2018. As it is not justified and desirable for the legislator's criminal policy and court case jurisprudence to have a different approach in relation to these criminal offenses (different valuation and grading of severity of organized crimes), we will also make certain proposals for de lege ferenda. The paper is a continuation of earlier researches of this problem and is based on the analysis of court judgments in organized crime cases.

Drones have an increasing role in criminal investigation, primarily in conducting investigations, but also in other criminal investigation activities, especially searching the scene after the event is over or monitoring event that is still active. The body conducting the investigation, which is first and foremost the police, must quickly and visibly secure the scene as well as all objects and traces on it. Search, recording and documentation, collection and analysis from the site must be performed without harassment and contamination. The entry of staff into the area carries risk and requires time, staff and complex activities. The seizure of the drone, as well as basic and forensic analysis of the drone and its contents is the basis for gathering evidence. In addition to drones, smartphones play a key role in this process because they are the basis for telephone - drone communication, and can be crucial for determining the status in flight, and lead to all products of drone activity - in the form of photos and videos. All this should shed light on the role of the user or owner of the drone if someone else has misused that communication and taken control over of the drone. Parts of the drone have unique markings and the analysis of physical components is carried out as part of the forensics of physical parts, as well as data generated during the flight that are analyzed as part of digital forensics. All this will enable the drone flight to be shown. On the other hand, adequate development of protection against illegal use of drones as well as investigations related to them implies monitoring and following the trends in this area. What is especially important to point out is that drone operations differ significantly in times of peace, crisis and war. The fight against the misuse of drones includes the use of all available means and methods, as well as the exploitation of all the weaknesses that drones in general and certain types of drones have. First of all, drone deactivation refers to the focus on the drone itself rather than on other components of the system such as remote control, communication and personnel operating the aircraft.

Sažetak: Inicijativa za postojanje stalnog međunarodnog krivičnog suda koji bi bio nadležan za najteže zločine na teritorijama država članica Ujedinjenih nacija -prisutna je odavno u međunarodnoj krivičnoj javnosti. Ideja je pretvorena u stvarnost tek stupanjem na snagu Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda. Ovaj statut je međunarodni ugovor kojim je stvoren Međunarodni krivični sud. Statut određuje jurisdikciju, strukturu i funkcije ovog suda i stavlja mu u nadležnost krivična djela genocida, zločine protiv čovječnosti, ratne zločine i agresiju. Rimski statut podsjeća da je dužnost svake države provoditi svoju nadležnost u krivičnim stvarima nad onima koji su odgovorni za počinjenje međunarodnih zločina. Isto tako, naglašava da Međunarodni krivični sud dopunjuje nacionalnu nadležnost u krivičnim stvarima. Trebalo bi da države članice Skupštine država stranaka osiguraju učinkovitu istragu i prema potrebi progon počinilaca krivičnih djela iz nadležnost Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, i to bez uplitanja u nadležnost ovog suda.Ključne riječi: ratni zločin, Međunarodni krivični sud, Rimski statut, Ženevske konvencije, krivično djelo. UVODNE NAPOMENERatni zločin u najširem smislu označava svako ono krivično djelo koje predstavlja povredu ratnog, odnosno međunarodnog krivičnog prava. Međunarodne konvencije pod time podrazumijevaju "povrede zakona i običaja rata", što uključuje ubistva, zlostavljanje i deportaciju civilnog stanovništva u logore za prisilni rad, ubistva i zlostavljanje ratnih zarobljenika, ubistva talaca i uništenje gradova i naselja koje nije opravdano vojnim potrebama.Ratni zločini su defi nisani u članu 8 Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda 1 . Radi o složenoj dispoziciji krivičnopravne norme, pa se razlikuje više oblika ovog teškog krivičnog djela. Djelo se sastoji iz različitih djelatnosti koje su izvršene kao dio plana ili politike ili ako je taj zločin izvršen masovno. To su uopšteno nasilne radnje koje povređuju temeljne vrijednosti ljudskog bića (život, slobodu, dostojanstvo, zdravlje), počinjeni od strane većeg broja ljudi koji mogu, ali ne moraju pripadati državnom aparatu i protiv civilnog stanovništva. Ratni zločini su vezani uz po-1 U daljnjem tekstu: Rimski statut.jam ratnog prava, tj. pravila koje države moraju poštovati u primjeni sile u cilju ograničavanja patnji uzrokovanih oruža-nim sukobima, odnosno u cilju uspostavljanja minimalnih načela čovječnosti i ličnog dostojanstva. Ovi zločini mogu da budu izvršeni i u međunarodnom i u unutrašnjem oružanom sukobu.Međunarodni krivični sud 2 je nadležan da postupa u odnosu na ratne zločine posebno kada su oni počinjeni kao dio plana ili politike ili u velikom broju slučajeva. Ratnim zločinom se, u duhu Rimskog statuta smatra: (a) ozbiljno kršenje Ženevskih konvencija od 12. avgusta 1949. godine, tačnije postupci protiv lica ili imovine zaštićenih odredbama određene Ženevske konvencije ; (b) druge ozbiljne povrede zakona i ratnih običaja koji se primjenjuju u međuna-rodnom oružanom sukobu, a prema utvrđenim pravilima međunarodnog p...

Based on international standards adopted within the framework and under the Organisation of the United Nations, all national legislations recognise several different types and forms of criminal acts regarding misuse of narcotics. It is the matter of various activities of unauthorized production, traffic and other forms of inciting or enabling others to come into possession of narcotics for immediate use, which seriously endangers the health and life.Depending on the needs of each individual state, the distinction is made between the offenses, for the perpetrators are given different types and measures of penalties and other criminal sanctions. A similar situation exists in the Republic of Serbia.The paper analyzes the system of criminal offenses in various types and forms of manifestation in the theoretical and practical sense for whose offenders that are prescribed serious criminal sanctions.