Background: This study reviews the patient demographics, functional outcomes, and complications of trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis as a treatment for arthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. Methods: A literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles located by the search were independently assessed by title, abstract, or full article review for inclusion or exclusion. Demographic, outcome, and complication data from included articles were extracted, compiled, and analyzed. Frequency-weighted means and proportions were generated. Results: In total, 21 articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria accounting for 802 patients and 914 thumbs. Average age at time of surgery was 55.4 years, and mean follow-up time was 72.7 months. Arthrodesis techniques include Kirschner-wire fixation (51.3%), plate fixation (24.6%), screw fixation (9.8%), tension band technique (7.1%), staple fixation (7.0%), and none (<0.1%). Mean preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 58 and 25.4 postoperatively (∆ = -32.6 points). Mean preoperative visual analogue scale score was 6.8 and 1.9 postoperatively (∆ = -4.9 points). Mean preoperative grip strength was 15.7 kg, and 23.0 kg postoperatively (∆ = +7.3 kg). In all, 48.7% of thumbs had complications, 15.1% of which were major, while 33.6% were minor. The most common major complication was symptomatic hardware (8.6%) requiring return to the operating room, and the most common minor complications were peritrapezial arthritis (8.5%) and nonunion (8.4%). Conclusions: Arthrodesis for arthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint is associated with good functional outcomes and low to moderate patient-reported disability and pain scores, but a high complication rate. Level of Evidence: IV

INTRODUCTION As virtual education becomes more widespread, particularly considering the recent COVID-19 pandemic, studies that assess the impact of online teaching strategies are vital. Current anatomy curriculum at Paul L. Foster School of Medicine consists of self-taught PowerPoint material, clinical vignette-centered team-based learning (dry lab), and prosection-based instruction (wet lab). This study examined the impact of video-based muscle model (VBMM) instruction using a student-designed forearm muscle model on anatomy quiz scores and student perceptions of its effectiveness with regards to learning outcomes. METHODS Students divided into Group 1 (54 students) and Group 2 (53 students) were assessed prior to and following a 3.5-minute video on anterior forearm compartment musculature using the muscle model. Group 1 began by completing a pretest, then received VBMM instruction, and then completed a posttest prior to participating in the standard dry lab and 1 hour wet lab. Group 2 completed the wet lab, then received the pretest, VBMM instruction, and posttest prior to participating in the dry lab. Both groups took an identical five-question quiz covering locations and functions of various anterior forearm muscles each time. RESULTS Mean scores were higher than no formal intervention with exposure to VBMM instruction alone (0.73 points, P = .01), wet lab alone (0.88 points, P = .002), and wet lab plus VBMM instruction (1.35 points, P= <.001). No significant difference in scores was found between instruction with VBMM versus wet lab alone ( P = 1.00), or between either instruction method alone compared to a combination of the two methods ( P = .34, .09). Student survey opinions on the VBMM instruction method were positive. CONCLUSION VBMM instruction is comparable to prosection-based lab with regards to score outcomes and was well received by students as both an independent learning tool and as a supplement to cadaveric lab. When compared to either instruction method alone, the supplementation of VBMM with cadaveric prosection instruction was best. VBMM instruction may be valuable for institutions without access to cadaveric specimens, or those looking to supplement their current anatomy curriculum.

No abstract

The PRECICE® intramedullary rod (NuVasive, San Diego, CA) utilizes multiple telescopic components to magnetically drive limb lengthening. These devices are routinely explanted after desired growth correction is met. To the author’s knowledge, this is the first description of an osteotomy assisted extraction of a disassociated tibial magnetic lengthening rod. A 17-year-old girl with fibular hemimelia and resolved left tibial length discrepancy after successful surgical lengthening underwent a complex implant removal approximately seven years after regenerate consolidation. During implant removal, the telescopic portion of the rod remained lodged in the tibial medullary canal and a subsequent unroofing osteotomy of the tibia was performed. Tibial limb length discrepancies are oftentimes corrected with complex implants comprised of multiple fragile components that are routinely explanted. During the unfortunate event of a telescopic intramedullary rod dissociation, an unroofing osteotomy can be successfully performed to removal all implant components.