No abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attributes of Primary Health Care (PHC) for rural workers; to analyze sociodemographic conditions, history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment; and to verify exposure to pesticides by determining bioindicators. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study with a sample of 1,027 rural workers living in municipalities belonging to a regional health department in Southern Minas Gerais, whose PHC is governed by the Family Health Strategy model. We used the adult version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool Brazil) and a structured questionnaire to collect socioeconomic data, history of poisoning and hospitalization for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment. Blood samples were collected to measure biomarkers of pesticide exposure and signs of renal and hepatic sequelae. RESULTS: Low education was prevalent, as well as the intense contact of workers with pesticides. Frequent use of personal protective equipment was higher among men, as was the history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides. Rates of 20% poisoning, 15% liver disease and 2% nephropathy were detected. Signs of hepatotoxicity were more frequent in men. Gender differences were all statistically significant. Regarding PHC, only the attribute “degree of affiliation” had a high score. None of the poisoning cases detected in the study were previously diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high coverage of the Family Health Strategy, occupational risk and its consequences have not been detected by health services, which do not seem oriented to primary care, even lacking their essential attributes. There is a need for immediate and effective adaptation of public policies regarding the health of rural workers, with adequate training of teams and review of the portfolio of PHC services offered.

No abstract

Introduction: heart failure is a crippling disease that reduces the quality of life; therefore, it is a serious public health problem. Objectives: to analyze the epidemiological and assistance care profile of heart failure patients admitted to a regional reference hospital. Statistically correlate clinical signs to diagnostic criteria and admissions to primary care services. To verify consistency between the treatment used and heart failure guidelines. Patients and methods: this was a prevalence, cross-sectional, and an exploratory study conducted through the reading of medical charts from a regional reference hospital from patients whose cause for hospitalization was heart failure in 2010. The data were analyzed in the Epi-Info 3.5 software. Frequency analysis and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated taking into account the P-value calculated through the Fisher's exact test. The project was approved by the University Ethics Committee (Protocol 159/2011). Results: 54 medical records were analyzed; 81% of patients had access to a primary care unit in the area of their residence. Dyslipidemia was associated with the highest number of hospitalizations (OR = 16/P = 0.034). The primary etiology of heart failure was systemic hypertensive heart disease (72.2%). The main risk factors found were hypertension (66.7%), smoking (48.1%), diabetes mellitus (44.4%), and dyslipidemia (40.7%). Out of the heart failure diagnoses, 68.52% could have been made from the Framingham criteria. Conclusions: permanent education programs are needed for addressing heart failure risk factors, evaluation and adherence to treatment, and active search for cases in the primary care as well as diagnosis of heart failure and its proper management.

Jogos sérios são usados para ajudar alunos e professores no aprendizado. Na área de educação médica, o jogo InsuOnline foi implementado para treinar médicos clínicos a usar a insulina no tratamento do diabetes mellitus, no contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde. Este projeto teve como objetivo investigar evidências empíricas de problemas no InsuOnline através de avaliação heurística com time interdisciplinar de especialistas em usabilidade e educação médica, e testes de usabilidade tendo estudantes de medicina como usuários do jogo. Os resultados auxiliam a fornecer melhores subsídios para que desenvolvedores possam usar recomendações baseadas em dados empíricos, permitindo a melhoria de técnicas e métodos para o design e avaliação efetiva de jogos sérios.