Although the effect of levocarnitine (L‐carnitine) on hyperammonemia has been reported in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), its effect on sarcopenia remains to be elucidated. We assessed the effects of L‐carnitine on sarcopenia in patients with LC. We retrospectively evaluated 52 patients with LC who were treated with L‐carnitine for more than 3 months between February 2013 and June 2017. Computed tomography was used to measure the cross‐sectional area of the skeletal muscles at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. The relative change in skeletal muscle index (SMI) per year (ΔSMI/year) was computed in each patient. We evaluated the relationship between ΔSMI/year and various parameters, such as age, sex, liver functional reserve, and dose of L‐carnitine. The median ΔSMI/year for all patients was −0.22%. The ΔSMI/year values in Child‐Pugh classes A, B, and C were not significantly different among the three groups. There was no significant relationship between ΔSMI/year and sex, age, body mass index, and sarcopenia. Multivariate analysis showed that only a high dose of L‐carnitine (odds ratio [OR], 4.812; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.233‐18.784; P = 0.024) was associated with increased muscle mass. The L‐carnitine high‐dose group included a significantly larger number of patients with increased muscle mass compared with the low‐dose group (OR, 3.568; 95% CI, 1.138‐11.185; P = 0.027). Administration of L‐carnitine led to a significant and gradual reduction in serum ammonia levels. Conclusion: L‐carnitine seems to suppress the progression of sarcopenia dose dependently, and this was noted to be associated with the improvement of hyperammonemia in patients with LC.
Study approval. All experiments with mice were approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University (A18-64). All experiments with human samples were approved under NTUH-REC 201812063RINC and OHSRP 18-NIDDK-00585.
Background: Although lenvatinib was recently approved for treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the phase III REFLECT trial, no biomarkers for management of lenvatinib treatment have been established. The aim of this study is to identify predictive biomarkers for the management of lenvatinib treatment in advanced HCC patients. Methods: A total of 41 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. Serum levels of 22 circulating cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) were measured by multiplex Luminex assay. Profiles of CAFs, clinical chemistry/hematology parameters, and clinical background were evaluated to explore biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes. Results: Relative dose intensity (RDI) decreased significantly between weeks 1–2 and 3–4 ( p < 0.001), and RDI during weeks 3–4 was a prominent indicator of progression-free survival (PFS). A signature based on baseline serum levels of nine CAFs associated with low RDI was identified. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, patients with a favorable 9-CAFs signature [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.96, p = 0.040] had lower risk, and Child-Pugh grade B (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–8.3, p = 0.026) and presence of macrovascular invasion (MVI; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.0–8.3, p = 0.045) had higher risk of shorter PFS. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that RDI is an important predictive factor for longer PFS during lenvatinib treatment. In this hypothesis-generating exploratory analysis, we report that a CAF-signature associated with adverse events and RDI could predict PFS, which might contribute to improved management of lenvatinib treatment in HCC patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.