Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relation between a firm's cash conversion cycle and its profitability. Design/methodology/approach -The relation between the firm's cash conversion cycle and its profitability is examined using dynamic panel data analysis for a sample of Japanese firms for the period from 1990 to 2004. The analysis is applied at the levels of the full sample and divisions of the sample by industry and by size. Findings -A strong negative relation between the length of the firm's cash conversion cycle and its profitability is found in all of the authors' study samples except for consumer goods companies and services companies. Originality/value -Traditional focus in corporate finance was on the long-term financial decisions, particularly capital structure, dividends, and company valuation decisions. However, the recent trend in corporate finance is the focus on working capital management. Most of working capital management literature is based on the US experience. This study investigates the relation between the firm's cash conversion cycle and its profitability of Japanese firms where the organizational structure is totally different from that of the US firms; most of the Japanese firms are interconnected and related through corporate groups (keiretsu).

This study aims to explore the application of a new audit regulation, International Standard on Auditing no. 701 (ISA 701) on Key Audit Matters (KAMs), in the developing country context of Jordan. To do so, the researchers analyzed the content of audit reports issued in Jordan in 2017 and 2018, and conducted interviews with 18 Jordanian audit partners and directors involved in KAM reporting. Findings of this study show that the number of KAMs reported in Jordan is relatively small, and that they emphasize items such as accounts receivable, inventory, investment property, and revenue. They also show that audit firms generally disagree on the nature and content of KAMs, overwhelmingly tend to report industry‐specific KAMs rather than entity‐specific KAMs, and avoid reporting KAMs related to governance or internal controls. Justifications by interviewees include ambiguity of ISA 701 and discretion in its application, fear of displeasing closely held clients who do not demand high‐quality audits, and limited interest by regulatory authorities in the detailed content of KAMs.

Large international audit firms are increasingly expanding their activities around the world and increasingly promoting the concept of a similar quality audit to be performed by all their worldwide offices and member firms. This strategy includes developing and using a similar audit approach globally. This study surveys the views of Jordanian auditors, mainly from audit firms with international affiliations, about how such an international approach, with emphasis on the currently popular business risk approach, is applied in practice by Jordanian audit firms and how appropriate and practical the application of such an international approach to auditing is in different contexts. The results of the study show that the business risk approach has been generally adopted by the larger Jordanian audit firms to varying extents, especially those which are full members of an international audit firm network. However, audit clients in Jordan face too many business risks, especially because of poor control systems, poor corporate governance structures, and unclear or non-existent corporate strategies and objectives. These risks have to be addressed by the business risk approach under very low audit fees. Such factors have led to the business risk approach not being applied in the way that the large international audit firms intended, and not achieving the approach's main objectives, leaving the audit profession with the question of how appropriate it is to adopt an international audit approach in different contexts. SUMMARYThis study surveys views of Jordanian auditors about how the business risk audit approach is applied in practice by Jordanian audit firms and how appropriate and practical the application of such an international approach to auditing is in a

Este estudio investiga si algunos atributos de la calidad de auditoría son capaces de restringir la manipulación de resultados en un país en desarrollo, Jordania, cuyo contexto cultural, económico e institucional es muy diferente del contexto de los países analizados anteriormente. Se usó la regresión de mínimos cuadrados generalizada (GLS) para estudiar la asociación entre dos atributos de la calidad de auditoría (tamaño del auditor y honorarios de auditoría) y los ajustes por devengos discrecionales, como proxy de la manipulación de resultados, para una muestra de empresas industriales que cotizan en la Bolsa de valores de Amman durante el período 2012 - 2016. Los resultados son consistentes con la expectativa de que en los países emergentes la auditoría externa puede funcionar de manera diferente a la de los países anglosajones y de Europa occidental con respecto a su papel en la restricción de la manipulación de resultados e indican que, dado el entorno institucional en Jordania, el tamaño del auditor y los honorarios de auditoría no tienen un efecto significativo en la manipulación de resultados. Este estudio proporciona a los lectores información sobre si y cómo el entorno institucional influye en la relación entre la calidad de la auditoría y la manipulación de resultados. Además, presenta nueva evidencia sobre el efecto moderador del nivel de los honorarios de auditoría en su relación con la manipulación de resultados. Los resultados de este estudio podrían proporcionar información valiosa a los reguladores, tanto en Jordania como en otros países con un entorno económico e institucional similar, para prevenir las prácticas de manipulación de resultados. This study investigates whether some audit quality attributes are capable to restrict earnings management in a developing country, Jordan, whose cultural, economic and institutional context is very different from most previously analyzed countries’ context. Generalized least square regression (GLS) was used to study the association between two audit quality attributes (auditor size and audit fees) and discretionary accruals, as a proxy of earnings management, for a sample of industrial firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange during the period 2012 – 2016. The findings are consistent with the expectation that in emerging countries external audit can function differently from that in Anglo-Saxon and West-European countries with regard to its role in restricting earnings management and indicate that, given the institutional environment in Jordan, auditor size and audit fees have no significant effect on earnings management. This study provides readers with information about if and how the institutional setting influences the relationship between audit quality and earnings management. Furthermore, it presents new evidence regarding the moderating effect of the level of audit fees on their relation with earnings management. This study’s findings could provide valuable information to regulators and standards setters, both in Jordan and other countries with a similar economic and institutional environment, which can help in preventing earnings management practices.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between related party transactions and both accrual and real earnings management practices in Jordanian industrial public-listed companies, taking into account the uniqueness of the Jordanian company ownership structure. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from Jordanian industrial public-listed companies for the period 2011–2017. Accrual earnings management is measured by using the modified Jones model, whereas real earnings management and related party transactions are measured by using relevant proxies. A regression model is developed and used to assess the relation between related party transactions and earnings management, taking into account the effects of ownership concentration, family ownership and institutional ownership levels of the companies involved. Findings Accrual earnings management is negatively associated with related party transactions. Regarding the role of ownership structure, the presence of institutional investors is positively associated with using both related party transactions and real earnings management, whereas ownership concentration plays an efficient role to mitigate the use of both accrual earnings management and related party transactions. No statistically significant relations between real earnings management and related party transactions exist. Practical implications This study has direct practical implications for the Jordanian regulatory authorities to enact regulations to limit the misuse of related party transactions and earnings management transactions and ensure sufficient monitoring of these transactions because of their prevalence. Jordanian companies should also enhance their corporate governance systems to better approve and monitor such transactions, including enhancing the role of independent and non-controlling board members in this process. Originality/value Related party transactions are considered as a major concern of financial reporting quality in developed countries, and such transactions are found to be relatively more problematic in developing countries, where corporate governance is generally weak, and there is limited disclosure and transparency in financial reporting. From this perspective, this study is one of the very few studies in developing countries that explore the issue of related party transactions and their association with earnings management practices. Thus, the findings of this study can arguably be to some extent generalized to other developing country contexts, because of relatively similar business environment conditions, and therefore potentially fill a gap represented by the paucity of similar studies in developing countries.