Recent matrix completion based methods have not been able to properly model the Haplotype Assembly Problem (HAP) for noisy observations. To deal with such cases, we propose a new Minimum Error Correction (MEC) based matrix completion problem over the manifold of rank-one matrices. We then prove the convergence of a specific iterative algorithm to solve this problem. From the simulation results, the proposed method not only outperforms some well-known matrix completion based methods, but also shows a more accurate result compared to a most recent MEC based algorithm for haplotype estimation.

No abstract

The max-cut problem addresses the problem of finding a cut for a graph that splits the graph into two subsets of vertices so that the number of edges between these two subsets is as large as possible. However, this problem is NP-Hard, which may be solved by suboptimal algorithms. In this paper, we propose a fast and accurate Riemannian optimization algorithm for solving the max-cut problem. To do so, we develop a gradient descent algorithm and prove its convergence. Our simulation results show that the proposed method is extremely efficient on some already-investigated graphs. Specifically, our method is on average 50 times faster than the best well-known techniques with slightly losing the performance, which is on average 0.9729 of the max-cut value of the others.

<p>The max-cut problem addresses the problem of finding a cut for a graph that splits the graph into two subsets of vertices so that the number of edges between these two subsets is as large as possible. However, this problem is NP-Hard, which may be solved by suboptimal algorithms. In this paper, we propose a fast and accurate Riemannian optimization algorithm for solving the max-cut problem. To do so, we develop a gradient descent algorithm and prove its convergence. Our simulation results show that the proposed method is extremely efficient on some already-investigated graphs. Specifically, our method is on average 50 times faster than the best well-known techniques with slightly losing the performance, which is on average 0.9729 of the max-cut value of the others.</p> <p></p>

No abstract