The pulsed corneal cross-linking protocol induced a significantly deeper stromal demarcation line when compared to the 4 minutes of highly accelerated continuous CXL protocol. Neither CXL protocol induced a shallower demarcation line comparable to less accelerated CXL protocols previously reported.
Purpose: To compare topical cyclosporine-A 2% eye drop (Cs-A) with prednisolone acetate 1% eye drop for treatment of herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK). Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 38 eyes of 33 patients with HSK were randomly assigned to receive either 2% Cs-A or 1% prednisolone acetate eye drops. All subjects received oral acyclovir 400 mg twice a day. Slit-lamp examination, Scheimpflug tomography corneal optical densitometry (Pentacamâ, Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intra-ocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated at the first visit, and 14 and 30 days after the treatment. Results: Within-group analysis revealed significant improvement of total cornea optical density after 30 days of treatment in both groups (30.3 AE 10.5 to 28.3 AE 9.8, p < 0.001 for prednisolone group, and 30.5 AE 8.8 to 28.8 AE 8.3 p < 0.001 for Cs-A group, mean AE SD). We were not able to disclose any significant difference between the two groups regarding the improvement of cornea optical density (p = 0.66). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR significantly improved in both groups after 30 days of treatment (0.20 AE 0.52, p = 0.002 in prednisolone group, and 0.24 AE 0.31, p < 0.001 in Cs-A group, mean AE SD). Analysis between groups did not show a significant difference of BCVA improvement (p = 0.45). We did not observe any severe side effect attributable to drugs. Conclusions: Cs-A 2% and prednisolone acetate 1% topical eye drops are effective for treatment of HSK.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.