Thyrotrophin receptor antibodies (TRAb) exist as stimulating or blocking antibodies in the serum (neutral TRAb have been identified recently). The clinical features of GD occur when stimulating TRAb predominate. But the relationship of TRAb to clinical phenotype and outcome is not clear when current assay methods are used. Therefore no consensus exists about its utility in diagnosing and predicting outcome in GD. The most commonly used TRAb assays, measure thyroid binding inhibiting immunoglobulins (TBII or “receptor assays”) and don’t differentiate between stimulating and blocking antibodies. However, the more expensive, technically demanding and less freely available “biological assays” differentiate between them by their ability to stimulate cyclic AMP or failure to do so. Failure to differentiate between TRAb types and its heterogeneous molecular and functional properties has limited TBII use to GD diagnosis and differentiating from other forms of thyrotoxicosis. The current 2nd-3rd generation receptor assays are highly sensitive and specific when used for this purpose. TRAb assays should also be done in appropriate pregnant women. Current data do not support its use in outcome prediction as there is a significant variability of assay methodology, population characteristics and study design in published data, resulting in a lack of consensus.

The reasons for an immunological paradigm shift in this elderly woman remain speculative. We believe that de-novo TSAb synthesis occurred converting her long-standing HT to GD although the mechanisms responsible remain unexplained. TRAb analysis confirmed stable autoantibody characteristics over 1 year and variable effects of TSHR mutations on TRAb and M22 function.

Summary A 53-year-old man who used growth hormone (GH), anabolic steroids and testosterone (T) for over 20 years presented with severe constipation and hypercalcaemia. He had benign prostatic hyperplasia and renal stones but no significant family history. Investigations showed – (1) corrected calcium (reference range) 3.66 mmol/L (2.2–2.6), phosphate 1.39 mmol/L (0.80–1.50), and PTH 2 pmol/L (1.6–7.2); (2) urea 21.9 mmol/L (2.5–7.8), creatinine 319 mmol/L (58–110), eGFR 18 mL/min (>90), and urine analysis (protein 4+, glucose 4+, red cells 2+); (3) creatine kinase 7952 U/L (40–320), positive anti Jo-1, and Ro-52 antibodies; (4) vitamin D 46 nmol/L (30–50), vitamin D3 29 pmol/L (55–139), vitamin A 4.65 mmol/L (1.10–2.60), and normal protein electrophoresis; (5) normal CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis and MRI of muscles showed ‘inflammation’, myositis and calcification; (6) biopsy of thigh muscles showed active myositis, chronic myopathic changes and mineral deposition and of the kidneys showed positive CD3 and CD45, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and hypercalcaemic tubular changes; and (7) echocardiography showed left ventricular hypertrophy (likely medications and myositis contributing), aortic stenosis and an ejection fraction of 44%, and MRI confirmed these with possible right coronary artery disease. Hypercalcaemia was possibly multifactorial – (1) calcium release following myositis, rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury; (2) possible primary hyperparathyroidism (a low but detectable PTH); and (3) hypervitaminosis A. He was hydrated and given pamidronate, mycophenolate and prednisolone. Following initial biochemical and clinical improvement, he had multiple subsequent admissions for hypercalcaemia and renal deterioration. He continued taking GH and T despite counselling but died suddenly of a myocardial infarction. Learning points: The differential diagnosis of hypercalcaemia is sometimes a challenge. Diagnosis may require multidisciplinary expertise and multiple and invasive investigations. There may be several disparate causes for hypercalcaemia, although one usually predominates. Maintaining ‘body image’ even with the use of harmful drugs may be an overpowering emotion despite counselling about their dangers.

Impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus are a manifestation of several well recognised endocrine disorders. Hyperglycaemia subsides upon removal of the underlying cause in these conditions - usually a hormone secreting tumour. We describe two subjects who were cured of their poorly controlled diabetes mellitus following surgical removal of a phaeochromocytoma and a cortisol secreting adrenal adenoma and review the mechanisms underlying glucose intolerance in endocrine disorders. The reported incidence of diabetes is variable in these conditions and may range between 2-95%. The severity is also variable as some affected individuals have only minor glucose intolerance while others have frank symptomatic diabetes mellitus which forms a major manifestation of their illness. The mechanisms causing hyperglycaemia are (a) insulin resistance, (b) increased hepatic glucose production and output, (c) decreased insulin production and release and (d) increased intestinal glucose absorption. Multiple intermediate mechanisms which include electrolyte perturbations and hormone receptor and post receptor mediated effects are responsible for these abnormalities. An understanding of these mechanisms and diagnostic strategies is important as these may be used to advantage in managing these patients. We describe some of these in greater detail below.

Summary Objective TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb) are responsible for autoimmune hyperthyroid disease (Graves’ disease; GD) with TRAb levels tending to decrease following treatment. Measurement of TRAb activity during follow‐up could prove valuable to better understand treatment effectiveness. Study design TRAb concentration and stimulating (TSAb) and blocking (TSBAb) activity of patient serum were assessed following different treatment modalities and follow‐up length. Methods Sixty‐six subjects were recruited following treatment with carbimazole (n = 26), radioiodine (n = 27) or surgery (n = 13). TRAb, TPOAb, TgAb and GADAb were measured at a follow‐up visit as well as bioassays of TSAb and TSBAb activity. Results Forty‐five per cent of all patients remained TRAb‐positive for more than one year and 23% for more than 5 years after diagnosis, irrespective of treatment method. Overall, TRAb concentration fell from a median (IQR) of 6.25 (3.9‐12.7) to 0.65 (0.38‐3.2) U/L. Surgery conferred the largest fall in TRAb concentration from 11.4 (6.7‐29) to 0.58 (0.4‐1.4) U/L. Seventy per cent of TRAb‐positive patients were positive for TSAb, and one patient (3%) was positive for TSBAb. TRAb and TSAb correlated well (r = 0.83). In addition, 38/66 patients were TgAb‐positive, 47/66 were TPOAb‐positive and 6/66 were GADAb‐positive at follow‐up. Conclusions TRAb levels generally decreased after treatment but persisted for over 5 years in some patients. TRAb activity was predominantly stimulatory, with only one patient demonstrating TSBAb. A large proportion of patients were TgAb/TPOAb‐positive at follow‐up. All treatment modalities reduced TRAb concentrations; however, surgery was most effective.