We describe the clinical patterns and case-fatality rate associated with severe Rift Valley fever (RVF) in patients who were admitted to the Gizan regional referral hospital during an outbreak of RVF in Saudi Arabia from September through November 2000. A total of 165 consecutive patients (136 men and 29 women) were prospectively studied; all were identified according to a strict case definition, were confirmed to have RVF by serologic testing, and were treated according to a predetermined protocol. The major clinical characteristics of RVF included a high frequency of hepatocellular failure in 124 patients (75.2%), acute renal failure in 68 patients (41.2%), and hemorrhagic manifestations in 32 patients (19.4%). Sixteen patients had retinitis and 7 patients had meningoencephalitis as late complications in the course of the disease. A total of 56 patients (33.9%) died. Hepatorenal failure, shock, and severe anemia were major factors associated with patient death.

To determine the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis E virus (IgM anti-HEV) among haemodialysis patients and evaluate whether there was an increased risk of infection and exposure to HEV in an area of endemic viral hepatitis, serum samples obtained from 83 Saudi patients on chronic haemodialysis (group 1), 400 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects (group 2) and hospital patients (group 3) were tested for the IgM anti-HEV and IgG anti-HEV. The prevalence of anti-HEV among the patients (group 1) and the healthy controls were 4.8% and 0.3%, respectively. The difference (4.5%) was statistically significant, with a calculated odds ratio (OR) of 20.2 (95% CI = 2.1-481.0; P = 0.0002). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the prevalence rates of IgG anti-HEV (7.2% vs 10.8%) in both groups. In nonhaemodialysis patients with various diseases, 1.6% (1 of 64) of outpatients (group 3) and none (0 of 113) of the ward patients (group 4) was positive for IgM anti-HEV. Thus, the prevalence (4 of 83) of IgM anti-HEV in the haemodialysis patients was significantly higher than the rate (1 of 177) in the combined groups of nonhaemodialysis hospital patients. The calculated OR was 8.9 (95% CI = 0.92, 212.8; P = 0.037). IgM antibody to hepatitis A virus (IgM anti-HAV) was not detected in any subjects, and the prevalence rates of IgG anti-HAV were similar in the patients and controls (72.3% and 74.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and 75.7% combined groups 3 and 4). The study indicated a significantly higher risk of acute HEV infection among patients on chronic haemodialysis. It is possible that these were nosocomial infections acquired by person-to-person transmission in the haemodialysis unit. However, it is more probable that the infections were community acquired, a conclusion supported albeit indirectly by the lack of a significant difference between the prevalence in haemodialysis patients (4.8%) and outpatients (1.6%). In areas of endemic HEV, appropriate strategies should be adopted to prevent the risk of HEV among haemodialysis patients.

Hepatitis B virus constitutes a major risk factor and HCV contributes a less significant role in the development of HCC. The ongoing program of HBV vaccination may significantly decrease the prevalence of HBV-associated HCC in this population.

Hyperlipidemia especially low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major risk factor for developing ischemic heart disease. Soluble dietary fiber has lipid lowering characteristics. Gum Arabic (GA) is 95% soluble fiber calculated on dry bases. The beneficial effect of GA on lipid profile needs further verification. A case–control study was conducted at Omdurman Hospital, Sudan to assess the effect of G A on serum lipids in patients with hyperlipidemia. Cases received a 20 mg tablet of atorvastatin /day plus 30 mg of GA for 4 weeks while the controls received atorvastatin only. Levels of lipids in serum were assessed according to conventional methods before and 1 month after the trial. There is no significant difference in the basic characteristics between the study and the control groups (55 patients in each arm of the study). While there was no significant difference in the levels of HDL, there was a significant reduction of the total cholesterol (25.9 vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001), triglyceride (38.2 vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001), and LDL (30.8 vs. 8.1%, P < 0.001) before and after the intervention in the study compared to the controls groups.

No abstract