Propolis is a chemically complex resinous bee product which has gained worldwide popularity as a means to improve health condition and prevent diseases. The main constituents of an aqueous extract of a sample of green propolis from Southeast Brazil were shown by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy to be mono- and di-O-caffeoylquinic acids; phenylpropanoids known as important constituents of alcohol extracts of green propolis, such as artepillin C and drupanin were also detected in low amounts in the aqueous extract. The anti-inflammatory activity of this extract was evaluated by determination of wound healing parameters. Female Swiss mice were implanted subcutaneously with polyesther-polyurethane sponge discs to induce wound healing responses, and administered orally with green propolis (500 mg kg−1). At 4, 7 and 14 days post-implantation, the fibrovascular stroma and deposition of extracellular matrix were evaluated by histopathologic and morphometric analyses. In the propolis-treated group at Days 4 and 7 the inflammatory process in the sponge was reduced in comparison with control. A progressive increase in cell influx and collagen deposition was observed in control and propolis-treated groups during the whole period. However, these effects were attenuated in the propolis-treated group at Days 4 and 7, indicating that key factors of the wound healing process are modulated by propolis constituents.
Inflammation and angiogenesis are key components of fibrovascular tissue growth, a biological event underlying both physiological (wound healing) and pathological conditions (tumor development, chronic inflammation). We investigated these components in three frequently used mouse strains (Swiss, Balb/c and C57BL/6J) to verify the influence of genetic background on the kinetics of inflammatory cell recruitment/activation, neovascularization, extracellular matrix deposition, and cytokine production in polyether-polyurethane sponge implanted subcutaneously in male mice of these strains. The kinetics of neutrophil recruitment/activation as assessed by myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity was 2- and 3-fold higher in Balb/c implants at day 1 compared with Swiss and C57BL/6J implants, respectively. Macrophage accumulation/activation as NAG (n-acetyl β-glucosaminidase) activity was higher in Swiss implants. The levels the monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (CCL2(MCP-1)) peaked at day 10 in the three types of implants but was produced more by C57BL/6J mice. Angiogenesis (hemoglobin, vascular endothelial growth factor-VEGF, and number of vessels) differed among the strains. Swiss implants had the highest hemoglobin content but the lowest VEGF levels. In contrast, Balb/c implants had higher VEGF levels but lower hemoglobin. Collagen deposition and transforming growth factor β-1; TGFβ-1 levels also varied among the groups. Swiss and Balb/c implants had progressive increase in TGFβ-1 from 4 to 14 days, while C57BL/6J implants achieved the peak at day 10 and fell at day 14. These findings emphasize the major contribution of genetic background in the temporal pattern and intensity of inflammatory angiogenesis components that may have functional consequences in physiological and pathological conditions where these processes co-exist.
The specific PDE4 inhibitor (rolipram) has been shown to attenuate excessive accumulation/activation of inflammatory cells and fibroblasts and cytokine production in several pathological conditions through cyclic nucleotide modulation. Here, using the murine sponge model to induce chronic subcutaneous inflammatory response and to elicit the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions we explored the hypothesis that rolipram would exert beneficial effects on decreasing key components of both processes (inflammatory cell recruitment, angiogenesis, and deposition of extracellular matrix component). Two doses of rolipram (0.2 or 2 mg/kg/day) were administered orally for 7 days in groups of mice bearing either subcutaneous or intraperitoneal polyether-polyurethane implants. Rolipram was effective in inhibiting angiogenesis as assessed by hemoglobin content and VEGF levels in subcutaneous implants (about 40% with both doses) but failed to exert this activity in intraperitoneal implants. Conversely, accumulation of neutrophils and macrophages determined by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) and N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG) activities intraimplant, respectively, was attenuated only in intraperitoneal implants by the treatment. Levels of TNF-alpha and MCP-1 were also determined and rolipram at both doses decreased the production of both cytokines in intraperitoneal implants. The levels of MCP-1 in the subcutaneous implants were not affected by the treatment. Fibrosis was evaluated by determining the amount of collagen and production of TGF-beta1 intraimplant. Both parameters were attenuated by rolipram. These results have shown differential sensitivity of proliferating tissues to PDE4 inhibitor indicating that this agent may be used to target inflammatory angiogenesis selectively.
Angiogenesis and inflammation are persistent features of several pathological conditions. Propolis, a sticky material that honeybees collect from living plants, has been reported to have multiple biological effects including anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplasic activities. Here, we investigated the effects of water extract of green propolis (WEP) on angiogenesis, inflammatory cell accumulation and endogenous production of cytokines in sponge implants of mice over a 14-day period. Blood vessel formation as assessed by hemoglobin content and by morphometric analysis of the implants was reduced by WEP (500 mg kg−1 orally) compared to the untreated group. The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) increased progressively in the treated group but decreased after Day 10 in the control group. Accumulation of neutrophils and macrophages was determined by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities, respectively. Neutrophil accumulation was unaffected by propolis, but NAG activity was reduced by the treatment at Day 14. The levels TGF-β1 intra-implant increased progressively in both groups but were higher (40%) at Day 14 in the control implants. The pro-inflammatory levels of TNF-α peaked at Day 7 in the control implants, and at Day 14 in the propolis-treated group. Our results indicate that the anti-inflammatory/anti-angiogenic effects of propolis are associated with cytokine modulation.
Synthetic matrices have been used widely to repair and/or to replace biological tissues. However, there is relatively little information on the effect of different anatomical compartments on the host response to foreign implants. We have analyzed such responses to sponge implants in subcutaneous and in intraperitoneal sites in mice at days 3, 5, and 8 postimplantation by measuring inflammation, angiogenesis, and production of proangiogenic/inflammatory cytokines. The angiogenic response, assessed by hemoglobin content and by morphometric analysis of the number of vessels, was higher in intraperitoneal implants. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in intraperitoneal implants were 14-fold higher than in subcutaneous implants at day 3 and remained high for the next 5 days. Neutrophil accumulation as determined by myeloperoxidase activity was the same in both types of implants. Macrophage accumulation (N-acetylglucosaminidase activity) was also similar on days 3 and 8 in both implants. Levels of the chemokine CXCL2/KC were always higher, but those of CCL2/JE lower, in the intraperitoneal implant. These results demonstrate that the anatomical site of the implant markedly influenced the host response to synthetic matrices. Our results provide a greater understanding of factors affecting the biocompatibility of exogenous materials placed at different anatomical sites.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.