Two areas that remain the focus of improvement in pancreatic cancer include high post-operative morbidity and inability to uniformly translate surgical success into long-term survival. This narrative review addresses specific aspects of pancreatic cancer surgery, including neoadjuvant therapy, vascular resections, extended pancreatectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy and current status of minimally invasive surgery. R0 resection confers longer disease-free survival and overall survival. Vascular and adjacent organ resections should be undertaken after neoadjuvant therapy, only if R0 resection can be ensured based on high-quality preoperative imaging, and that too, with acceptable post-operative morbidity. Extended lymphadenectomy does not offer any advantage over standard lymphadenectomy. Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies offers some short-term benefits over open distal pancreatectomy, safety remains a concern with minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. Strict adherence to principles and judicious utilization of surgery within a multimodality framework is the way forward.

Purpose Patients undergoing hepatectomy are at moderate-to-high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study critically examines the efficacy of combining pharmacological (PTP) and mechanical thromboprophylaxis (MTP) versus only MTP in reducing VTE events against the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Methods A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken, and a meta-analysis was performed using common-effects model. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to assess the precision and conclusiveness of the results. Results 8 studies (n = 4238 patients) meeting inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Use of PTP + MTP was found to be associated with significantly lower VTE rates compared to only MTP (2.5% vs 5.3%; pooled RR 0.50, p = 0.03, I2 = 46%) with minimal type I error. PTP + MTP was not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications (3.04% vs 1.9%; pooled RR 1.54, p = 0.11, I2 = 0%) and had no significant impact on post-operative length of stay (12.1 vs 10.8 days; pooled MD − 0.66, p = 0.98, I2 = 0%) and mortality (2.9% vs 3.7%; pooled RR 0.73, p = 0.33, I2 = 0%). Conclusion Despite differences in the baseline patient characteristics, extent of hepatectomy, PTP regimens, and heterogeneity in the pooled analysis, the current study supports the use of PTP in post-hepatectomy patients (grade of recommendation: strong) as the combination of PTP + MTP is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE (level of evidence, moderate), without an increased risk of post-hepatectomy hemorrhage (level of evidence, low).

Aim: To determine the frequency and relevance of deviations from a post pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) clinical care pathway. Materials & methods: A retrospective analysis using a prospectively maintained database of a post-PD clinical care pathway was carried out between May 2016 and March 2018. Patients were divided based on the number of factors deviating from the clinical care pathway (Group I: no deviation; Group II: deviation in 1–4 factors; Group III: deviation in 5–8 factors). The analysis included profiling of patients on different demographic and clinical as well as medical and surgical outcome parameters (discharge by postoperative day 8 and 90-day unplanned re-admission rate). Results: Post-PD clinical care pathways are feasible but deviations from the pathway are frequent (91%). An increase in frequency of deviations from the pathway was significantly associated with increased risk of POPF and delayed gastric emptying, delayed discharge, risk of mortality and 90-day unplanned re-admission rate. Conclusion: Deviations from a post-PD clinical care pathway are common. Poor nutrition and cardiac co-morbidities are associated with an increased likelihood of deviation. As the number of deviations increase, so does the risk of significant complications and interventions, delayed discharge and 90-day re-admission rate.

No abstract