Silicon-graphite electrodes usually experience an increase in cycling performance by the addition of graphite, however, the relation of the silicon/graphite ratio and the aging mechanisms of the individual electrode and electrolyte compounds still requires a more fundamental understanding. In this study, we present a comprehensive approach to understand and quantify the degradation phenomena in silicon-graphite electrodes with silicon contents between 20-60 wt%. By evaluating the cycling performance and total irreversible capacity of silicon-graphite electrodes vs. capacitively oversized LiFePO 4 electrodes in presence of a fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC)-containing electrolyte, we demonstrate that the aging of silicon-based electrodes can be distinguished into two distinct phenomena, which we describe as silicon particle degradation and electrode degradation. Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and a detailed analysis of the electrode polarization upon cycling complement our discussion. Further, we deploy post-mortem 19 F-NMR spectroscopy to (i) quantify to loss of moles of FEC in the electrolyte and correlate this with the amount of charge that was exchanged by the silicon-graphite electrodes, (ii) estimate the pore volume of the silicon-graphite electrodes that is occupied by FEC decomposition products, and (iii) Silicon-based electrodes are very promising candidates to enable the next generation of Li-ion batteries with energy densities on the cell level beyond 350 Wh kg −1 . 1,2 In contrast to conventional intercalation anode materials, such as graphite (LiC 6 , 372 mAh g −1 , 890 Ah L −1 ), the specific capacity of silicon alloy electrodes is significantly higher (Li 15 Si 4 , 3579 mAh g −1 , 2194 Ah L −1 ). 3 Nonetheless, commercialization of silicon-based electrodes is still hampered because of two major challenges: 4 (i) Large volume expansions up to 280% upon repeated (de-)lithiation of silicon particles deteriorate the electrode integrity, thus causing isolation of active material. [5][6][7] The formerly reported pulverization of micron-sized silicon particles due to mechanical stress upon repeated volume expansion has been partially solved by using nanometer-sized particles. However, reduction of the silicon particle size also leads to inferior electronic conduction due to more numerous interparticle contacts, and higher solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) losses due to the larger relative surface area. [8][9][10] (ii) Continuous side reactions at the silicon/electrolyte interface caused by repeated volume expansion and contraction result in ongoing electrolyte decomposition and in a gradual loss of active lithium. 8In the course of this, SEI-forming additives in the electrolyte, e.g., FEC, are depleted, which was shown to result in a significant increase in cell polarization and a concomitant rapid capacity drop. 8,11 Various strategies have been proposed to overcome the detrimental effects associated with the volume expansion during (de-)lithiation of silicon and to reduce conc...
Silicon-graphite electrodes usually exhibit improved cycling stability when limiting the capacity exchanged by the silicon particles per cycle. Yet, the influence of the upper and the lower cutoff potential was repeatedly shown to differ significantly. In the present study, we address this discrepancy by investigating two distinct degradation phenomena occurring in silicon-graphite electrodes, namely (i) the roughening of the silicon particles upon repeated (de-)lithiation which leads to increased irreversible capacity losses, and (ii) the decay in the reversible capacity which mainly originates from increased electronic interparticle resistances between the silicon particles. First, we investigate the cycling stability and polarization of the silicon-graphite electrodes in dependence on different cutoff potentials using pseudo full-cells with capacitively oversized LiFePO 4 cathodes. Further, we characterize postmortem the morphological changes of the silicon nanoparticles by means of scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) as a function of the cycle number. To evaluate the degradation of the entire electrode coating, we finally complement our investigation by impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with a gold-wire micro-reference electrode and post-mortem analyses of the electrode structure and coating thickness by cross-sectional SEM. Silicon is among the most promising anode materials for future lithium-ion batteries.1,2 For example, a prismatic hard case cell comprising a silicon-carbon anode with 1000 mAh gand an NMC811 cathode would offer a specific energy of up to ∼280 Wh kgcell . 3 In contrast to state-of-the-art graphite electrodes, where lithium is inserted into the interlayers between the graphene sheets, silicon reacts with lithium and forms Li x Si alloys.4-6 Because the (de-)alloying reaction allows a higher lithium uptake per silicon atom (3579 mAh g −1Si , Li 15 Si 4 ) compared to the intercalation of lithium into the graphite host structure (372 mAh g −1 C , LiC 6 ), silicon offers an about ∼10 times larger theoretical specific capacity. However, while the intercalation chemistry reveals excellent cycling stability with only minor irreversible changes of the graphite's morphology (ca. +10%), 8 the (de-)alloying reaction causes significant morphological and chemical changes to the silicon particles, including (i) a large volume expansion of up to +280% and (ii) repeated breakage and formation of Si-Si bonds, which leads to severe mechanical stress and particle fracturing. [9][10][11][12] Upon continued cycling, these morphological changes cause a rapid capacity decay of silicon-based electrodes, which is largely driven by the electrical isolation of the fractured silicon particles.13-17 Nanometer-sized structures, including nanoparticles and nanowires, were shown to mitigate the mechanical stress which results from volumetric changes during the (de-)alloying reaction.12,18-20 However, there exists a trade-off, because the reduction of the particle size als...
Nickel-rich NCM (LiMO2, with M = Ni, Co, and Mn) cathode active materials for lithium-ion batteries are being increasingly commercialized due to their high specific capacity. However, their capacity retention upon cycling is impaired by crack formation of NCM secondary agglomerates induced by the volume change upon repeated (de)lithiation that depends on the nickel content and the cutoff potential. Particle cracking leads to loss of electrical contact and enhanced side reactions caused by an increased surface area. Here, we introduce a novel method based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in blocking conditions to quantify the increase in the active material’s surface area upon cycling, utilizing the correlation between the surface area of the electrode and the electrochemical double-layer capacitance that is validated experimentally by comparing the capacitance and BET surface area increase of NCM electrodes upon mechanical compression. To quantify the cracking of the particles upon 200 charge/discharge cycles, we perform in situ EIS measurements utilizing a micro-reference electrode and monitor the cathode’s impedance response. In addition, the crack formation of cycled NCM particles is validated visually by post mortem FIB-SEM. The effect of volume change on cracking is illuminated through the analysis of LFP and LTO as model materials.
Vinylene Carbonate (VC) is an effective electrolyte additive to produce a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on graphite anodes, increasing the capacity retention of lithium-ion cells. However, in combination with LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO) cathodes, VC drastically decreases cell performance. In this study we use on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with a micro-reference electrode to understand the oxidative (in-)stability of VC and its effect on the interfacial resistances of both anode and cathode. We herein compare different VC concentrations corresponding to VC to graphite surface area ratios typically used in commercial-scale cells. At low VC concentrations (0.09 wt%, corresponding to 1 wt% in commercial-scale cells), an impedance increase exclusively on the anode and an improved capacity retention is observed, whereas higher VC concentrations (0.17 wt -2 wt%, corresponding to 2 wt -23 wt% in commercial-scale cells) show an increase in both cathode and anode impedance as well as worse cycling performance and overcharge capacity during the first cycle. By considering the onset potentials for VC reduction and oxidation in graphite/LNMO cells, we demonstrate that low amounts of VC can be reduced before VC oxidation occurs, which is sufficient to effectively passivate the graphite anode. During the first charge of a lithium ion battery (LiB), the so called solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) 1 is formed on the surface of the negative electrode. The standard electrolyte for LiBs consists of a mixture of cyclic and linear carbonates, e.g., ethylene carbonate (EC) and ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), typically with lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF 6 ) as salt. Starting from a potential of ∼0.8 V vs. Li/Li + , EC is reduced electrochemically into ethylene gas and lithium ethylene dicarbonate (LEDC), which is a key component of the SEI.2,3 Vinylene carbonate (VC) is one of the most effective additives to modify the SEI on graphite anodes, as it is reduced at potentials more positive than 1.0 V vs. Li/Li + and hence suppresses the reduction of EC. 4,5Aurbach et al. have used VC as electrolyte additive in an EC/DMC (dimethyl carbonate) based electrolyte and that time reported a reduction of the irreversible capacity in the first cycles and an improved cycling stability at elevated temperatures for graphite anodes. The SEI resulting from the reduction of VC consists mainly of poly (vinylene carbonate) (poly(VC)). 4,6Important studies on the impact of different VC concentrations in graphite/NMC pouch cells have been carried out by the Dahn group. For example, Burns et al. 7 investigated the effect of different concentrations of VC (0, 1 and 2 wt%) on cycle life and impedance growth of full-cells with graphite anodes and either LCO (LiCoO 2 ) or NMC (Li(Ni 0.42 Mn 0.42 Co 0.16 )O 2 ) cathodes, employing galvanostatic cycling experiments coupled with high precision coulombic efficiency and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. For cel...
Nickel-rich NCMs (LiMO2, with M = Ni, Co, and Mn) are increasingly commercialized as cathode active materials for lithium-ion batteries due to their high specific capacity. However, the available capacity is limited due to their structural instability at high state of charge, causing the formation of a resistive surface layer upon release of lattice oxygen, observed at different upper cutoff potentials depending on the NCM composition. To understand the impact of this instability, the correlation of oxygen release, capacity fading, and particle cracking was investigated as a function of state of charge for three nickel-rich NCMs, differing either in composition (i.e., in transition metal ratio) or in morphology (i.e., in primary crystallite size). First, the onset of the release of lattice oxygen was identified by on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS). In electrochemical cycling experiments, the NCM capacitance was tracked in situ by impedance spectroscopy (EIS) using a micro-reference electrode while the upper cutoff potential was increased every third cycle stepwise from 3.9 V to 5.0 V. Hereby, the effect of the degree of delithiation on the discharge capacity and on the particle integrity (tracked via its surface area) was examined, both for poly- and single-crystalline NCMs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.